VanEck’s Matthew Sigel outlines Bitcoin miners’ AI valuation framework
Bitcoin miners are no longer just Bitcoin miners. Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Assets Research at VanEck, laid out a valuation framework that makes the pecking order brutally clear. Companies with leased or colocation-backed facilities are trading above 10x EV/EBITDA. Pipeline-stage companies, meaning those still developing their infrastructure, are stuck in the 2-6x range.
The numbers behind the divide
WULF, with 430 megawatts of contracted colocation capacity, is commanding a valuation of roughly 24.2x EV/EBITDA. CIFR, sitting on 300 MW of interconnection initiatives, comes in at about 19.9x. RIOT, with 600 MW of remaining capacity, trades at 15.6x.
The miners that have pivoted toward AI and HPC partnerships, like WULF and CORZ, are outperforming traditional Bitcoin miners on a year-to-date basis. Multi-year contracts with AI customers produce predictable cash flows. Bitcoin mining revenues, by contrast, swing with hash rate, difficulty adjustments, and a coin price that can move 20% in a week.
The arbitrage hiding in plain sight
Public miners are currently valued at around $3 million per megawatt. Private data-center deals, on the other hand, are closing at roughly $8 million per MW. VanEck estimates the net present value upside from this kind of strategic pivot across the sector at approximately $37.6 billion.
What this means for investors
The 10x-plus multiples for leased companies versus 2-6x for pipeline companies suggest the market is already applying heavy discounts to development-stage capacity. A signed lease with a creditworthy counterparty is a very different thing than a press release about future plans, meaning there is significant upside for any pipeline company that successfully converts announced capacity into actual contracts.
The risk is that not every miner successfully makes the transition. AI customers demand uptime guarantees, redundancy, and cooling specifications that Bitcoin mining facilities weren’t always built to meet. Investors should watch for actual contract announcements and energized capacity milestones rather than taking pipeline figures at face value.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

