Solana activity craters 80% in three months as traders flee to perpetual platforms
Solana’s on-chain activity has fallen off a cliff. Trading volumes on decentralized exchanges across the network have dropped by more than 50%, DApp revenue has sunk to an 18-month low, and daily transaction fees are scraping levels not seen in months.
The numbers tell a brutal story
Solana DApp revenue fell to $22 million in March 2026. That figure stood at $36 million just two months prior, representing a roughly 39% decline in a shockingly short window.
Weekly DEX volume on Solana decreased by over 50% by late May 2026. Daily transaction fees have fallen to multi-month lows. The meme coin frenzy that drove much of Solana’s activity through 2024 and into 2025 has meaningfully subsided. Platforms like Pump.fun, which became synonymous with the rapid-fire creation and trading of meme tokens, have seen engagement crater.
Perpetual futures are eating Solana’s lunch
Hyperliquid has emerged as the dominant player in this space, capturing over 80% of the perpetuals market. That’s not a typo. A single platform now controls more than four-fifths of decentralized perpetual futures trading.
SOL’s price reflects the malaise
SOL has repeatedly tested support levels around $80 throughout 2026. In the most recent downturn, the token dipped below $76, marking a multi-month low. Funding rates on SOL perpetual contracts have been consistently low, a signal that bears are in control. Spot ETF inflows have provided some resilience, with institutional buyers continuing to allocate to SOL through exchange-traded products.
What this means for investors
DApp revenue falling to $22 million, an 18-month low, signals that developers may begin reconsidering their commitment to building on Solana. For SOL holders, the $80 support level is the line in the sand. Multiple tests of that zone suggest it’s a meaningful psychological and technical floor.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

