Charles Hoskinson responds to criticism regarding the 1.096 BTC from Cardano's initial sale.
- Hoskinson explains Cardano's use of 1.096 BTC
- Audit of initial sale raises public questions.
- ADA governance remains under scrutiny in 2026.
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has once again commented on one of the most debated issues within the ADA community, clarifying the fate of 1.096 BTC from the project's initial crowdfunding phase. The statement came during a public Q&A session, which also addressed topics related to network governance, community management, and future plans for official communication channels.
The controversy involves the collective sale held between October 2015 and January 2017. At the time, the initiative raised approximately 108.844 BTC to finance the development of Cardano. According to Hoskinson, part of this amount, equivalent to 1.096 BTC, was allocated to a foundation registered on the Isle of Man, responsible for legal and operational activities related to the project's initial steps.
The issue gained traction following questions raised by Thomas Braziel, founder of 117 Partners. The investor requested detailed clarifications regarding the reason for the transfer and the use of the funds, raising doubts about the financial structure adopted during that period.
During his explanation, Hoskinson stated that the origin of the expense is documented in a communication sent by Michael Parsons, then president of the initiative. According to him, the request was related to the remuneration of professionals involved in auditing the group sale.
“The closing price of Bitcoin on March 13, 2016 was $414. That equates to about $400.000 for three auditors,” Hoskinson said.
According to the executive, the funds were allocated to pay three independent reviewers: Michael Parsons, John McGuire, and Bruce Milligan. He also argued that the true value of the transaction is lower than what many critics currently suggest when considering the subsequent appreciation of Bitcoin.
Hoskinson added that the recurring demands for explanations end up consuming time and resources that could be directed towards the development of the ecosystem. In his assessment, new answers often generate new questions, without ending the discussion.
Even after the clarifications, Braziel stated that the explanation presented did not resolve the existing doubts. In a social media post, he advocated for the release of documents proving the hiring of the auditors and the execution of the payments.
"If that's the explanation, the next step is simple: publish the invoices, contracts, approvals, and payment records."
The investor also disputed the calculations presented, arguing that a possible audit could have occurred at a later period, when Bitcoin was already trading at higher values. According to him, "the numbers simply don't add up."
The discussion takes place at a time of intense debate within the Cardano community. Alongside financial issues, the project team is working on a plan to migrate part of its ADA community to Discord. Furthermore, recent decisions related to the Cardano Foundation's budget have come under increased public scrutiny.
The proposal approval process has also drawn the attention of network participants, especially after only a portion of the requests received the green light under the new governance model. Another issue that broadened the debate was the cancellation of the 2026 Singapore Summit, after a US$7,8 million request from the ADA Treasury related to the event was not approved.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.
Crypto prices
More
