Currency crisis emerges, what are the trends for gold and silver?
Over the past two decades, global central banks have continued to increase their foreign exchange reserves, and their overall risk resilience has significantly improved. However, market confidence is often influenced by price performance.
From a medium- to long-term perspective, strong physical gold demand in Asian markets will become a key force supporting gold and silver prices after market liquidity adjustments take effect. According to the latest data from the World Gold Council, Indonesia's demand for gold bars and coins surged by 47% in the first quarter of this year compared to the same period last year, with the public clearly viewing physical gold as the best tool to hedge against the depreciation of the rupiah and inflation. Locally, gold bars are priced in Indonesian rupiah, with long-term premiums maintained between 7% and 14%. In crisis environments, market enthusiasm for buying gold increases further. Meanwhile, demand for gold investment in countries such as India and Thailand has also strengthened simultaneously. Even though high gold prices have somewhat suppressed jewelry consumption, investment demand remains particularly strong.
Therefore, this Asian currency crisis is likely to first bring significant fluctuations to gold and silver prices: in the short term, a strong US dollar will suppress prices and lead to a noticeable correction; once this adjustment is completed, and physical buying data from Asia is gradually confirmed, capital flows back into gold and silver will become more pronounced, driving another wave of rebound.
Editor | Jiao Yang Layout | Jiao Yang Visuals | Zhang Zongwei
Proofreading | Wang Bei Review | Ni Jinhe
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
CoreWeave's quarterly report hits record highs, but Bernstein and HSBC still maintain "sell" ratings
The main concerns focus on three major issues: management claims an annual price of $20-25 million per megawatt, while actual financial data shows only $9.2 million; independent calculations by two institutions both indicate a financing gap of about $33 billion; by 2028, the market will see an influx of 55 gigawatts of new computing power, 20 times CoreWeave’s own capacity. With current debt at $46.9 billion and equity only $4 billion, and no free cash flow within this decade—the question of whether its scarce performance can last until the loans are repaid is something even strong quarterly reports cannot answer.

The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

