Shareholders Sue Microsoft: Downplaying AI Infrastructure Costs, Hiding Azure Growth Slowdown
Reuters published a blog post yesterday (June 15), reporting that based on a class action lawsuit filed this week in the US Federal Court in Seattle, shareholders have accused Microsoft of downplaying the costs of AI infrastructure and concealing the slowdown in growth of Azure.
The lawsuit was initiated by the City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System in Michigan, representing other investors who purchased Microsoft shares, and filed with the Federal Court in Seattle against Microsoft and certain executives, including CEO Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood, as a class-action securities lawsuit.
In this class action, the plaintiffs allege that Microsoft deliberately amplified the AI business narrative to divert market attention from the slowing growth of its cloud business and the surging infrastructure costs, thereby conveying overly optimistic growth expectations to investors.
The plaintiffs believe Microsoft intentionally downplayed AI infrastructure costs, asserting that the construction of data centers required to support next-generation AI tools demands significant capital investment, and the return on investment would not come easily or quickly.
According to financial reports, in the second fiscal quarter of 2026 ending December 2025, revenue from Azure and other cloud businesses grew by 39%, in line with analysts’ expectations but lower than the 40% growth in the previous quarter. At the same time, the company expects the growth rate of this business to slow to 37% to 38% in the first three months of 2026, indicating the pace of expansion in its cloud business continues to decline.
In terms of capital expenditure, Microsoft's capital expenditure for the quarter reached $37.5 billion (approximately RMB 253.947 billion at the current exchange rate), representing a year-on-year increase of 66%, significantly exceeding analysts' expectations at the time. The report points out that much of this funding was allocated to high-priced GPUs and custom chips used for training and running large language models.
Microsoft stated that the related accusations are "baseless," the company stands by the integrity of its public statements, and will actively respond to the case in court.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Indian Rupee outperforms amid strong foreign inflows, shrugging off surging US Dollar
USD/JPY Price Forecast: Enters fresh upside leg on consolidation breakout
CoreWeave's quarterly report hits record highs, but Bernstein and HSBC still maintain "sell" ratings
The main concerns focus on three major issues: management claims an annual price of $20-25 million per megawatt, while actual financial data shows only $9.2 million; independent calculations by two institutions both indicate a financing gap of about $33 billion; by 2028, the market will see an influx of 55 gigawatts of new computing power, 20 times CoreWeave’s own capacity. With current debt at $46.9 billion and equity only $4 billion, and no free cash flow within this decade—the question of whether its scarce performance can last until the loans are repaid is something even strong quarterly reports cannot answer.
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
Crypto prices
More
