GSR’s Josh Riezman warns crypto legislation faces key ethics hurdle
The US crypto industry got tantalizingly close to regulatory clarity this year. Now it’s watching the whole thing potentially unravel over something that has nothing to do with tokens, exchanges, or blockchain technology: ethics rules.
Josh Riezman, Chief Legal and Strategy Officer at GSR, has flagged unresolved ethics provisions as a primary obstacle preventing the CLARITY Act from advancing. He’s assigned less than 50% odds for the bill’s passage within the current congressional session.
The ethics wall
The CLARITY Act is, on paper, exactly what the digital asset industry has been asking for. It would draw clear jurisdictional lines between the SEC and the CFTC, establish token classification frameworks, and set ground rules for exchanges, custody, and staking arrangements.
Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) stated on June 5 that she will not support the CLARITY Act without a consensus on ethics provisions.
Riezman participated in a discussion on the topic in mid-May, where he highlighted just how precarious the timeline has become. With a June 15 deadline approaching, no notable advancements on the ethics front have been reported.
What the CLARITY Act actually does
The CLARITY Act would give the CFTC explicit oversight over digital commodities. It would also define the securities-versus-commodities distinction. Beyond jurisdiction, the act sets standards for exchanges, addresses trade monitoring requirements, and establishes rules for how customer assets are handled in bankruptcy scenarios.
The bill isn’t emerging from a vacuum. Earlier this year, a bipartisan compromise on stablecoin yield rules was reached between Senate leaders, including cooperation between Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Alsobrooks herself. That deal was hammered out between March and May.
What this means for investors
Without regulatory clarity, US crypto firms continue operating in a gray zone where enforcement actions substitute for actual rulemaking. Jurisdictions like the EU, with its MiCA framework already in effect, and Singapore have moved ahead with clear regulatory structures.
Riezman’s less-than-50% odds assessment should be taken seriously. GSR operates as a major market maker in the crypto space, and its legal chief has direct visibility into the legislative dynamics at play.
Either negotiators find a path through the ethics impasse before the June 15 deadline, or the CLARITY Act joins the growing list of crypto legislation that was always just one more compromise away from becoming law. Alsobrooks’s stated precondition for support is currently the single biggest variable determining whether the US gets a crypto regulatory framework this session.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
CoreWeave's quarterly report hits record highs, but Bernstein and HSBC still maintain "sell" ratings
The main concerns focus on three major issues: management claims an annual price of $20-25 million per megawatt, while actual financial data shows only $9.2 million; independent calculations by two institutions both indicate a financing gap of about $33 billion; by 2028, the market will see an influx of 55 gigawatts of new computing power, 20 times CoreWeave’s own capacity. With current debt at $46.9 billion and equity only $4 billion, and no free cash flow within this decade—the question of whether its scarce performance can last until the loans are repaid is something even strong quarterly reports cannot answer.
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.
Crypto prices
More
