Benchmark says SEC's NMS proposal is the 'most consequential' US crypto rule this year
Benchmark Equity Research said the Securities and Exchange Commission’s June 11 proposal to rescind two decades-old market structure rules is "the most consequential piece of regulation to impact the U.S. crypto space" this year, arguing it would remove a key constraint on tokenized equities trading, lending and settlement on public blockchains.
The agency last week proposed scrapping Rule 611 and Rule 610(e) of Regulation NMS, the trade-through framework that has governed routing and execution for every U.S. equity since 2005. The SEC said the proposal is intended to simplify market structure and reduce costs while allowing competition and innovation to shape the evolution of U.S. equity markets.
In a note to investors on Monday, Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer said the rescission would remove the primary legal obstacle that has kept tokenized stocks from trading on automated market makers.
According to the note, Rule 611, known as the Order Protection Rule, requires trading centers to avoid executing trades at prices inferior to protected quotations displayed on other venues, effectively enforcing compliance with the national best bid and offer at the moment of execution. Rule 610(e) prohibits locked and crossed markets, requiring venues to prevent quotations that overlap in ways that violate the displayed price hierarchy.
Palmer stated that those provisions have hindered decentralized finance-based trading models, particularly automated market makers, which execute trades against continuous pricing curves rather than routed order books and do not reference intermarket price protection systems such as the NBBO.
The analyst added that observers in the market have pointed to tokenized and crypto equity exchanges as the most immediate beneficiaries of a potential rescission of Rule 611, given that removal of trade-through constraints would allow such venues to align more directly with existing equity market infrastructure.
Within that group, Benchmark’s note identified Securitize as the most direct potential beneficiary, citing its role as a regulated tokenization platform and issuer infrastructure provider for tokenized securities, including BlackRock’s BUILD initiative.
Benchmark also pointed to Coinbase Global and Galaxy Digital as additional beneficiaries, citing their respective roles in trading infrastructure, brokerage services, and digital asset market-making activity.
But even with the rescission proposal, several harder questions remain unanswered, Benchmark noted. Those include exchange and alternative trading system registration, custody, clearance and settlement frameworks for peer-to-peer or DeFi-native trading.
The crypto industry is counting on a forthcoming innovation exemption to address them, according to the note.
The SEC has opened a 60-day public comment period on the proposal. Benchmark expects a vote on the rescission to occur in early 2027.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
CoreWeave's quarterly report hits record highs, but Bernstein and HSBC still maintain "sell" ratings
The main concerns focus on three major issues: management claims an annual price of $20-25 million per megawatt, while actual financial data shows only $9.2 million; independent calculations by two institutions both indicate a financing gap of about $33 billion; by 2028, the market will see an influx of 55 gigawatts of new computing power, 20 times CoreWeave’s own capacity. With current debt at $46.9 billion and equity only $4 billion, and no free cash flow within this decade—the question of whether its scarce performance can last until the loans are repaid is something even strong quarterly reports cannot answer.
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.
Crypto prices
More
