'Let's just put it in an ETF' is the worst outcome for bitcoin, says Trezor exec
Investors have poured more than $53 billion into spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds since launching in the U.S. in early 2024.
But despite ETFs being a major driver of bitcoin's price in the years since, one of the crypto industry's oldest hardware wallet makers warns that they pose a risk to a core bitcoin principle: self-custody.
Speaking with The Block at BTC Prague last week, Trezor Chief Commercial Officer Danny Sanders argued that more bitcoin investors relying on ETFs instead of holding their own private keys would be detrimental to the industry.
Sanders made the comments while talking about some of the challenges of onboarding new users to self-custody, which allows users to be the sole controller of their bitcoin instead of entrusting their assets to exchanges or custodians.
This comes with a downside, however, in that there is no backstop or recourse for someone to get their crypto back if they lose or misprint their seed phrase, or get tricked into sharing their private keys with a scammer.
And while this can be an intimidating hurdle to overcome for new bitcoin holders, Sanders argued that the barriers are more psychological than technical.
"It sounds so scary, but it's actually not," Sanders said. "Once you do it, it's not that hard."
According to Sanders, the crypto industry now counts roughly 600 million users globally, but only around 10% self-custody their assets. Of those, just 12 million to 13 million use hardware wallets, which are generally considered the most secure way to hold one's private keys.
Trezor, which was founded in Prague in 2013, helped pioneer the crypto hardware wallet sector and introduced several foundational technologies that are still used in Bitcoin today, most notably the mnemonic seed phrase standard known as BIP-39.
In Sanders' opinion, the industry needs to continue focusing on making self-custody easier through better user experiences, educational tools, and backup systems rather than encouraging users to just rely on intermediaries.
"The goal is to match the web2 experience over time," Sanders said. "We're not there yet, but I think that's the hardest thing that we all need to keep on focusing on and not saying, 'Okay, let's just put it in an ETF.' That's kind of the worst outcome, I think, for the industry."
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
USD/JPY Price Forecast: Enters fresh upside leg on consolidation breakout
CoreWeave's quarterly report hits record highs, but Bernstein and HSBC still maintain "sell" ratings
The main concerns focus on three major issues: management claims an annual price of $20-25 million per megawatt, while actual financial data shows only $9.2 million; independent calculations by two institutions both indicate a financing gap of about $33 billion; by 2028, the market will see an influx of 55 gigawatts of new computing power, 20 times CoreWeave’s own capacity. With current debt at $46.9 billion and equity only $4 billion, and no free cash flow within this decade—the question of whether its scarce performance can last until the loans are repaid is something even strong quarterly reports cannot answer.
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
Crypto prices
More
