Bitcoin demand surges as investors buy dip after price crashes below $60K
Bitcoin touched $59,099 on June 5, slicing more than 50% off its October 2025 all-time high of roughly $126,000. Investors across wallet sizes increased their Bitcoin holdings in the wake of the crash, with Glassnode’s Accumulation Trend Score climbing to 0.75. That metric, which ranges from 0 to 1, measures how aggressively existing holders are adding to positions.
What triggered the crash
The drop below $60K wasn’t caused by a single event. Strategy, the company formerly known as MicroStrategy, sold a chunk of its holdings. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw record outflows. And a strong US jobs report sent yields higher, pulling risk appetite out of the market.
The combined liquidations reached $1.6 billion. Analysts described the deleveraging as “orderly.” The market didn’t spiral into cascading forced liquidations the way it has during past crashes.
Geoff Kendrick of Standard Chartered went as far as suggesting the bottom might be in, saying “the winter is over” for Bitcoin.
Who’s buying and how much
The most notable signal from the Glassnode data is that retail investors, those holding less than 1 BTC, started accumulating for the first time since December 2025. For six months, small holders had been net sellers or sitting on the sidelines. That changed when the price dipped below $60K.
Over 400,000 BTC were accumulated in the $60,000 to $70,000 price range, boosting the total supply held in that band by 43% since January 2026.
Strategy itself reversed course almost immediately after its initial sales. The company repurchased 1,550 BTC for approximately $101 million, a clear signal that its leadership views the sub-$60K prices as temporary.
BlackRock’s IBIT ETF, the largest Bitcoin spot fund by assets, also saw massive engagement. During a previous volatile session in February, the fund recorded roughly $10.7 billion in trading volume.
What this means for investors
A 50% drawdown from all-time highs sounds catastrophic, but Bitcoin has done this before. The 2017-2018 cycle saw an 84% peak-to-trough decline. The 2021-2022 cycle delivered roughly 77%. A 50% correction from $126K to $59K is, by Bitcoin’s historical standards, relatively standard behavior.
The difference this time is the buyer composition. In previous cycles, dip-buying was dominated by crypto-native whales and speculators. Now there’s a visible institutional layer, ETFs, publicly traded companies, and sovereign-adjacent funds, that treats sell-offs as entry points rather than exit signals. That structural demand didn’t exist at scale before 2024.
The risk, as always, is macro. The strong jobs data that helped trigger this sell-off points to a Federal Reserve that may keep rates elevated longer than markets hoped. Higher yields make risk assets less attractive on a relative basis.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
USD/JPY Price Forecast: Enters fresh upside leg on consolidation breakout
CoreWeave's quarterly report hits record highs, but Bernstein and HSBC still maintain "sell" ratings
The main concerns focus on three major issues: management claims an annual price of $20-25 million per megawatt, while actual financial data shows only $9.2 million; independent calculations by two institutions both indicate a financing gap of about $33 billion; by 2028, the market will see an influx of 55 gigawatts of new computing power, 20 times CoreWeave’s own capacity. With current debt at $46.9 billion and equity only $4 billion, and no free cash flow within this decade—the question of whether its scarce performance can last until the loans are repaid is something even strong quarterly reports cannot answer.
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
Crypto prices
More
