Australia’s largest gold miner Northern Star Resources (ASX: AU) has rejected a proposal from activist investor Elliott Investment Management to explore asset sales or a potential takeover, arguing the timing is wrong as the company works through operational challenges and a leadership transition.
Northern Star chair Michael Chaney said Wednesday the board does not support launching a sale process despite Elliott’s recent call for a strategic review after building a stake estimated at between 3% and 4%. Elliott’s proposal followed a series of guidance cuts over the past year as processing mill issues at Kalgoorlie contributed to the company’s underperformance relative to peers.
“With reference to Elliott’s suggestion that the board should run a sale process for the company, we do not consider that this is the right time to do so,” Chaney said in the letter to shareholders.
Chaney said Northern Star has previously considered takeover and merger approaches but concluded the proposals were not in shareholders’ best interests. “We had investment banks propose a spin-off of assets and we separately had our financial adviser review those options,” he said. “For now, we are comfortable holding the assets we do but this is a matter that will remain under regular review.”
Elliott’s mining track record
Elliott managed about $79.8 billion at the end of 2025 and has become one of the mining sector’s most closely watched activist investors. Last year, it disclosed a large stake in Toronto-based Barrick Mining (NYSE: B) (TSX: ABX) as the world’s third-largest gold producer struggled to capitalize on a rally in bullion prices.
The firm has also campaigned against BHP Group, pushing the miner to spin off its oil and gas business and simplify its dual-listed structure. Elliott previously targeted Kinross Gold, a campaign that resulted in a $300-million share buyback.
Northern Star faces pressure from aging pits, rising costs and recent guidance downgrades. UBS said in March the company could benefit from selling lower-margin, shorter-life mines, while Elliott argued a strategic review would allow the board to weigh a potential transaction against the risks of a multi-year turnaround.
The developments highlight growing pressure on mining companies to unlock shareholder value after periods of operational underperformance. Activist investors have increasingly targeted large resource companies, pushing for asset sales, spin-offs and strategic reviews when production setbacks or missed targets weigh on valuations.
