Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
ESPORTS plummeted over 93% within 24 hours: Multi-signature unlock by the team triggers large-scale sell-off

ESPORTS plummeted over 93% within 24 hours: Multi-signature unlock by the team triggers large-scale sell-off

Bitget PulseBitget Pulse2026/05/25 23:41
Show original
By:Bitget Pulse

Volatility Overview

ESPORTS (Yooldo Games) experienced dramatic price fluctuations in the past 24 hours, currently priced around $0.05486, with a 24-hour high of $0.76108 and a low of $0.05177, reflecting an amplitude of 1370.1%. The price has plummeted sharply from its previous high, dropping over 93% within 24 hours, resulting in a significant market cap decrease.

Trading volume surged significantly, reaching between $140 million and $198 million in 24 hours, a substantial increase from before, reflecting concentrated selling pressure and liquidity depletion.

Analysis of the Cause of Abnormal Movements

This abnormal movement was primarily driven by direct on-chain selling:

- The project team’s multi-sig wallet unlocked and transferred roughly 178–198 million ESPORTS tokens (about 43% of circulating supply), and concentrated sold them in a short period onto BNB Chain and centralized exchanges.

- A portion of the funds flowed to Kraken addresses linked to DWF Labs, raising concerns in the market about insider selling.

All of the above events occurred in the past 24 hours, with no other major positive news or official announcements supporting the price. The previous all-time high around May 20th (about $0.8094) now serves as a comparison backdrop.

Market Sentiment and Outlook

The mainstream sentiment among the community and analysts is pessimistic, characterizing this event as a suspected “pump-and-dump.” The token is now regarded as a “toxic asset,” with very low likelihood of short-term recovery. Some opinions warn investors of the risks associated with low-liquidity game tokens, and point out that DWF Labs-related transactions may further increase the risk premium of such assets.

The market outlook remains cautious. In the absence of fundamental support or compensatory measures (such as buybacks), the price is likely to remain under pressure. All analysis is based on publicly available on-chain data and news reports—users are advised to independently verify the latest on-chain information.

Note: This analysis is generated automatically by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, for informational purposes only.
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Just bet on AI and already faced a market blow! Berkshire reports earnings tonight, Abel faces a major test in his transformation

Greg Abel has been leading Berkshire Hathaway for less than a year, yet he has already made a bet of over $10.9 billion on the AI sector, marking a complete break from Buffett’s traditional avoidance of tech stocks. However, Alphabet’s stock price has fallen below their initial purchase cost, and Bending Spoons continues to decline, putting this bold AI gamble to the test. At the same time, third-quarter earnings per share are expected to drop 6% year-over-year, and the share repurchase program is likely to plummet from $4.5 billion to $1.6 billion. How to deploy $358 billion in cash will be a major challenge for the new leader’s capital allocation skills.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 09:11
Just bet on AI and already faced a market blow! Berkshire reports earnings tonight, Abel faces a major test in his transformation

Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now

The Goldman Sachs trading desk stated that the current wave of sell-offs resembles the 1998 liquidity crisis more than the bursting of the 2000 bubble. It is a forced deleveraging rather than a refutation of business fundamentals. The market is drastically repricing construction financing and timeline expectations, rather than underlying demand. Moreover, the issues currently drawing the most attention from the market—electricity and licensing—are actually the least important, as limited supply does not equate to disappearing demand. The real question that needs to be answered is whether long-term revenues can ultimately justify the capital invested.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 08:26
Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now