Goldman Sachs CEO Solomon: U.S. economic outlook may "depend on just one tweet"
Source: Jinse Finance
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon recently stated that whether the US economy will fall into recession largely depends on the government’s statements about the Iran conflict on social media. He bluntly said that volatility in economic prospects may “depend on nothing more than a tweet.”
In an interview at the Paley Center for Media in Manhattan, Solomon pointed out that although current economic forecasting models show that the risk of recession is still at a relatively low level, this stability is extremely fragile.
This statement reflects a harsh reality in today’s financial markets: Trump’s remarks on platforms like Truth Social are constantly affecting the nerves of the markets. Last week, Trump said on social media that Iran had agreed never to close the Strait of Hormuz. Although the message was not officially confirmed by Iran, it quickly triggered a US stock rally and a drop in oil prices.
Regarding Solomon’s statement, Goldman Sachs spokesman Tony Fratto later added that this was clearly a humorous comment by Solomon about the current phenomenon of “governing through social media.”
In terms of specific economic indicators, Goldman Sachs economists currently estimate the probability of a US economic recession this year at about 20%. In a “benign environment”, the baseline probability is usually 15%, so the current forecast has been slightly raised.
Energy prices are another key variable Solomon is watching. He believes that it is reasonable to expect crude oil prices to stay in the range of $80 to $100 per barrel over the next three to six months. However, he warned that if geopolitical conflicts escalate severely, oil prices could be pushed up to $170 per barrel.
Since the conflict broke out, crude oil futures benchmark prices have risen by about 30% in total. In March this year, oil prices once soared to nearly $120, and although they have since fallen back to around $95 due to Iran showing signs of engaging with the US, Solomon emphasized that sustained high energy costs will inevitably have a negative impact on various economic data later this year.
In his latest interview, Trump said that he had expected the Dow and S&P 500 to drop by 20%—the measure of a bear market—and oil prices to reach $200 per barrel.
Trump stated: “If you had told me back then oil would rise to $90, not $200, I’d definitely be surprised. And now, what’s happening is that ships are searching for other energy sources. They’re heading to Texas and Louisiana, to Alaska, and elsewhere. It’s a remarkable phenomenon.”
Regarding the stock market, he said that before the war he had expected a sharp sell-off. Trump said, “Look at the S&P 500, its value is exactly the same as when we started all of this. I originally thought it would fall 20% or drop significantly and that oil prices would be higher, and now I’m happy to say that’s not the case.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Gold recovers from YTD low, retakes $3,900; Fed hike bets and bullish USD to cap gains
Cerebras (CBRS.US) Cloud Business Soars, Masking Hardware Decline; OpenAI Supports Half of Cloud Revenue
Cerebras achieved record Q3 revenue, but hardware income dropped by nearly 30%, while cloud business accounted for two-thirds of total revenue. OpenAI contributed $72.4 million. The company raised its full-year guidance and expects Q4 to be close to breakeven.
Microsoft (MSFT.US) offers voluntary buyout packages to about 60,000 employees: Structural divergence in U.S. employment under AI transformation
In 2026, the U.S. labor market is characterized by both low layoffs and weak hiring. Companies like Microsoft and American Express are leveraging AI to optimize their workforce, while data centers are driving growth in the construction sector. However, entry-level white-collar jobs face increasing pressure, with real wages experiencing negative growth and structural transformation risks becoming more prominent.

