Harvard professor warns: US-Iran war could burden taxpayers with a "hefty bill" of $1 trillion
The financial cost of the US-Iran military conflict is far exceeding official figures and will have a profound impact on US Treasury bonds.
Linda Bilmes, professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School, pointed out in her latest research that she is certain the total cost of this Iran war will surpass $1 trillion. This assessment is based on short-term combat expenditures, long-term reconstruction and compensations for casualties, as well as the rising interest burden in a high-debt environment.
The Middle East conflict began on February 28, and the Pentagon reported to Congress that the first 6 days of combat cost $11.3 billion. Although a fragile ceasefire agreement remains in effect, negotiations for a lasting peace deal have so far failed.
Official Figures Underestimate Actual Costs
According to Bilmes’ estimates, the short-term direct cost during the 40 days of actual combat is about $2 billion per day, covering munitions, troop deployment, and military asset losses—including three F-15 fighter jets shot down due to friendly fire.
She noted that the Pentagon reports based on the historical value of stockpiles rather than current actual replacement cost, leading to a systemic underreporting of official figures. She stated: "These gaps are one of the reasons why the disclosed $11.3 billion is actually closer to $16 billion, reflecting a longstanding discrepancy between the Pentagon's real-time reporting and the true costs of war."
In addition, large multi-year contracts signed with Lockheed Martin and Boeing mean that the US pays as much as $4 million to replenish each interceptor missile, while each drone launched by Iran costs only about $30,000 to produce, further exacerbating fiscal pressure due to the cost asymmetry between the two sides.
Long-Term Burden: Reconstruction, Casualties, and Defense Expansion
In the long run, the cost of war will continue to accumulate due to multiple factors.
Bilmes pointed out that the US will need to rebuild its damaged military facilities and equipment in the region, and also bear the reconstruction costs for Gulf state allies’ infrastructure. Meanwhile, approximately 55,000 soldiers deployed in the region who have been exposed to toxins and environmental hazards pose a potential long-term fiscal drag on taxpayers due to lifetime disability compensation.
On the defense budget front, the White House has already asked Congress to increase the defense budget to $1.5 trillion, which would mark the largest military expansion since World War II. This figure does not include the Pentagon's separate $200 billion special funding request for the Iran war. Bilmes believes that even if Congress does not approve the full increase, an annual baseline increment of at least $100 billion in the defense budget is almost inevitable.
High Debt Plus High Interest Rates: Costs Passed to Future Generations
Bilmes compared this war to the Iraq war. The total cost of the Iraq war was about $2 trillion, and back then, US public debt held by the public was less than $4 trillion. Today, US public debt held by the public has surpassed $31 trillion, a significant portion of which stems directly from the debt left over from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
"We are now financing this war against a backdrop of higher interest rates and a much larger debt base," she said. "Interest expenses alone will add tens of billions of dollars to the total cost of the war. Unlike front-line direct expenditures, these interest costs are a burden we are clearly passing on to the next generation."
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Microsoft (MSFT.US) 365 services experience second major outage this year, affecting multiple government agencies and enterprises worldwide
Despite a "partial recovery," the latest Microsoft service outage continued into Asia-Pacific business hours.
Nvidia (NVDA.US) New CEO Candidates and Market Predictions: Trump Nominates Cook as Successor
As the successor remains uncertain, external voices have already begun to "make choices" for Nvidia.

Safe haven halo fails? US Treasury sell-off returns, Wall Street just breathed a sigh of relief and is startled again
Just as global bond investors began to believe that the worst phase of this year's sell-off had passed, the surge in U.S. Treasury yields has forced them to reassess that judgment.

Before the Jensen Huang scandal broke out, the Quant King precisely cleared out Nvidia!
The latest 13F filing shows that quantitative giant Renaissance Technologies almost completely sold off its holdings in Nvidia (reduced by 99.7%), Meta (reduced by 99.9%), as well as other tech giants like Apple and Amazon in the third quarter, and significantly reduced its position in Palantir. At the same time, it heavily increased its holdings in Micron Technology (up by 618.7%), AMD, and SanDisk, as well as other storage and chip stocks.

