Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
7 Traders Who Lost Everything Due to High-Leverage Trading

7 Traders Who Lost Everything Due to High-Leverage Trading

CoinspeakerCoinspeaker2025/11/05 16:00
By:By Wahid Pessarlay Editor Julia Sakovich

High-leverage trading has cost well-known traders millions of dollars as the crypto market wandered in volatility.

Key Notes

  • Price fluctuations brought massive losses to popular traders like James Wynn and Machi Big Brother.
  • Hyperliquid whales are betting against small-cap altcoins.
  • Top Hyperliquid trader betted over $300 million on BTC and ETH’s price fall.

Some of the most famous Hyperliquid traders might have learned an expensive lesson with high-leverage bets, but Abraxa Capital, a London-based crypto investment firm, is still betting big.

The cryptocurrency market has been seeing wild volatility over the past month, with leading assets witnessing huge selloffs.  Bitcoin BTC $103 123 24h volatility: 1.5% Market cap: $2.06 T Vol. 24h: $61.48 B recorded a 16.7% fall in the last 30 days while Ethereum ETH $3 400 24h volatility: 3.4% Market cap: $410.69 B Vol. 24h: $34.54 B  dropped even further, losing 28% of its value.

Perpetual traders took a hard blow. The famous James Wynn went from $87 million in profits to $21.9 million in losses, according to Lookonchain.

Stay away from high-leverage trading.

It might bring you big profits at first, but in the end, it'll wipe out everything you’ve earned.

Just ask the seven traders below. pic.twitter.com/mp6LPU5xf4

— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) November 6, 2025

Machi Big Brother, another trader on Hyperliquid, lost roughly $14.9 million. An unknown trader who turned $125,000 into $43 million in profit is also seeing $180,000 in losses.

“Stay away from high-leverage trading,” the market analysis firm wrote. “It might bring you big profits at first, but in the end, it’ll wipe out everything you’ve earned.”

A trader with a 14-win streak also hit a bump, losing $30.2 million. Aguila Trades, “Gambler @qwatio,” and the biggest Hyperliquid loser also lost $37.6 million, $28.8 million, and $45 million, respectively.

What Are Hyperliquid Whales Doing Now?

Big bettors are still leading the charts on Hyperliquid.  According to data from CoinGlass, the total value of whale positions on the exchange is at $5.8 billion ($2.7 billion longs and $3.1 billion shorts).

With the latest positive momentum , the BTC long/short ratio shifted to 56%/44%. ETH is also following closely, with 55.9% of the traders betting on its bullish momentum. Moreover, Hyperliquid whales are still uncertain about small-cap altcoins and have been majorly betting on their price fall.

On the other hand, the largest trader on the perpetual decentralized crypto exchange , Abraxa Capital, opened a $174 million short position on ETH with an entry price of $3,527. The firm’s BTC position, shorting the leading asset, is also worth $128.4 million with an entry price of $111,616.

Abraxa Capital is currently sitting on $17.2 million in unrealized profits.

next
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:56
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.

The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/12 03:46

After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

智通财经•2026/11/12 03:42
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%

For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

智通财经•2026/11/12 02:47
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%