Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is Closer Than You Think — Just Over 2 Years Away
A new quantum timeline warns Bitcoin’s cryptography could fail by 2028. As quantum computing nears critical power, developers race to deploy quantum-resistant systems before the clock runs out.
According to the Quantum Doomsday Clock, quantum computers could potentially break Bitcoin’s (BTC) encryption by March 8, 2028.
The quantum threat is more than a technical hurdle. It has a profound impact on digital assets and threatens the privacy of individuals relying on Bitcoin for financial freedom.
BTC Encryption Faces Deadline: Quantum Computers Near Breaking Point
The Quantum Doomsday Clock project has proposed a deadline for when quantum computers may gain the power to break modern encryption. According to the project, quantum machines need just 2 years, 4 months, and 2 days to reach the number of logical qubits needed to compromise Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency security.
Bitcoin may have just 2 years 4 months and 2 days.
— Charles Edwards (@caprioleio) November 5, 2025
The research also highlights exact qubit requirements: breaking RSA-2048 requires 2,314 logical qubits, RSA-4096 needs 3,971, and ECC-256 demands just 1,673 qubits. These calculations rely on surface code error correction, with estimated error rates ranging from 10^-3 to 10^-5.
They also consider the relationship between physical and logical qubits. Improvements in quantum error correction could further accelerate the timeline.
“Most recent work has been about controlling and reducing error rate, not qubit growth. If recent results are indicative, and focus shifts to qubit growth, then quantum supremacy could come sooner than anticipated,” the research reads.
The project cites foundational research by Gidney & Ekarå (2021), Chevignard et al. (2024), and Hyeonhak & Hong (2023). Once enough qubits are achieved, cryptographic attacks could run in hours or days.
The analysis also notes that pay-to-public-key-hash (P2PKH) Bitcoin wallets, which use unused public keys for each transaction, may enjoy a brief additional safety window. However, systems that continue relying on current cryptographic standards will eventually need to transition to post-quantum protocols to remain secure.
“While I don’t necessarily agree with how this is calculated. I think a target is good as it gives a visual we must work towards. If we haven’t solved quantum by this point for Bitcoin… we’re going down that creek without a paddle,” analyst Charles Edwards noted.
Experts Warn of Rising Quantum Threat to Bitcoin
Meanwhile, this is not the first time experts have raised alarms over the growing risks of quantum computing for Bitcoin. In October, IBM CTO Michael Osborne told BeInCrypto that quantum risks to Bitcoin’s cryptography are growing faster than expected.
IBM’s Starling project aims to build a fault-tolerant quantum computer by 2029, which could threaten Bitcoin’s cryptography. David Carvalho, CEO of Naoris Protocol, warned that rapid progress in quantum computing could break Bitcoin’s security within 2–3 years.
Similarly, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has cautioned that the network must migrate to quantum-resistant cryptography within five years to avoid potentially severe breaches.
As the quantum threat intensifies, tech firms are working diligently to develop quantum-resistant infrastructure. Last month, BTQ Technologies announced the first successful demonstration of a quantum-safe Bitcoin implementation using NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptography.
The project, called Bitcoin Quantum Core 0.2, replaces Bitcoin’s current ECDSA signatures—which are vulnerable to quantum attacks—with ML-DSA, a NIST-approved digital signature algorithm. This aims to protect the $2 trillion Bitcoin market from quantum attacks.
Thus, it’s clear that a quantum-enabled future is imminent, not theoretical. Blockchain projects, tokenization platforms, and decentralized finance ecosystems must move quickly to secure cryptography or risk obsolescence. The challenge is clear: the Bitcoin community must coordinate its migration to quantum-safe technology before it is too late.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.
If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.
Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.
Crypto prices
More
