4E: The "Bitcoin price will inevitably fall after halving" rule may no longer hold true; the EU plans to expand cryptocurrency regulation.
On November 3rd, according to 4E observation, the traditional volatility pattern of Bitcoin after halving may be failing. Data shows that the current Bitcoin volatility is below 2%, hitting a historical low, while during the third halving period in 2020, the volatility once exceeded 5%. Keiji Maeda, a senior executive at the Japanese crypto company BACKSEAT, pointed out that with increased market liquidity and institutional participation, the impact of individual investors' short-term behavior on prices is weakening, and the so-called "post-halving correction" empirical rule may no longer apply.
In the EU, the European Commission is planning to expand central supervision of stock and cryptocurrency exchanges. The new proposal will give more power to the European Securities and Markets Authority, covering "the most important cross-border entities," to promote the construction of a "capital market union" and reduce regulatory fragmentation. The related proposal is expected to be officially presented in December.
On the other hand, Michael Saylor, Chairman of Strategy, stated that the company currently has no plans to acquire other Bitcoin asset reserve companies, citing the high uncertainty and long cycle involved in such mergers.
Regarding investment institutions, the latest top 15 holdings of ARKK ETF under Cathie Wood show that companies related to cryptocurrencies such as Coinbase (5.8%) and Circle (2.55%) have significant weight, indicating their continued bet in the new round of technology and digital asset cycle.
4E comment: Bitcoin entering a historical low volatility range may indicate that the market structure has shifted from speculation-driven to fund stability. If EU regulatory integration and institutional allocation trends advance simultaneously, cryptocurrency assets may gradually enter a "low volatility stable bull" phase.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

