Can CBDCs Replace Cryptocurrencies? TON Founder: Decentralization Is the Future
TON Society co-founder Jack Booth discussed the future of decentralization, the impact of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and the path to mass adoption of cryptocurrencies in an interview with Cointelegraph. He believes that promoting the decentralization of The Open Network (TON) is crucial, emphasizing that decentralized networks allow users to have better control over their data and finances. Booth warned that CBDCs could undermine the principles of decentralization, but supports a hybrid solution combining CBDCs and decentralized networks. He also pointed out that decentralized technologies must offer high availability and user-friendliness in order to achieve mass adoption. Summary generated by Mars AI This summary was generated by the Mars AI model, and the accuracy and completeness of its content are still under iterative improvement.
Jack Booth from TON Society discussed the future of decentralization, the impact of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and the path to achieving mass adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Jack Booth, co-founder of TON Society, believes that the key to achieving mass adoption of cryptocurrencies lies in advancing decentralization within The Open Network (TON).
In an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph, Booth stated that his organization is committed to decentralizing finance and data on TON. The TON community is "building a decentralized ecosystem" to make decentralized finance (DeFi), data, and digital ownership "more widespread." Booth said:
"TON's mission is to achieve mass adoption. Our goal is to remove barriers for users and developers by making blockchain technology highly scalable, efficient, effective, and user-friendly, thereby making it easier for the public to embrace."
Booth stated that decentralized networks can enable users to better control their data and finances without relying on centralized authorities, but he warned that competing technologies such as CBDCs could undermine this.
The Threat of CBDCs
Booth believes that CBDCs pose a fundamental challenge to the core principles of decentralization, especially privacy and self-sovereignty:
"CBDCs represent a fundamentally different digital currency model. Their primary focus is on control and centralized issuance, which limits financial independence."
This stands in contrast to the views of CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta. In a recent interview with Cointelegraph, Gupta stated that CBDCs and cryptocurrencies can coexist and help implement monetary policy.
In an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph, Gupta pointed out that centralization "enables the effective implementation of monetary policy, thereby better managing inflation, liquidity, and interest rates."
TON Society's Strategy
In the tug-of-war between the centralization of CBDCs and the financial self-sovereignty of decentralization, Booth presented his vision for sustainable goals in this field:
"We support hybrid solutions, where CBDCs can interact with decentralized networks but cannot dominate them."
He explained that he believes "there is an opportunity to build a better, more inclusive, and safer financial system, but it must recognize the principles of decentralization."
"I firmly believe that policymakers should work with platforms, not against them [...] I hope regulators can establish broad principles rather than narrow rules."
Practical Decentralization
In the interview, Booth argued that if decentralization hopes to "achieve mass adoption," it must be "usable and accessible." He added:
"Although decentralization brings challenges, like any new technology, it is crucial to weigh its risks and benefits, such as greater transparency, resilience, and reduced points of failure."
In his view, despite current issues with decentralization, such as smart contract security risks and governance problems, it still "empowers communities" and provides a "fairer" distribution of risks and rewards.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The AI boom may follow the path of the 19th-century railway bubble, and builders may not be the ultimate winners
Goldman Sachs analyst Bobby Molavi compared the current situation to the 19th-century British railway mania: 500 companies spent more than the nation's annual income building 8,000 miles of railway, with most early investors losing out, while the real beneficiaries were the later "passengers." He pointed out that the current AI craze is driven by both debt and momentum, and that the S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio of 18x is only "a bit cheaper." Whether the builders can retain value is uncertain, and history does not offer an optimistic answer.

If Anthropic's IPO goes smoothly and the stock price rises next week, then everything remains the same for AI. Otherwise, some companies will go bankrupt.
The shrinking valuations of two major giants have triggered a chain reaction—investors are adopting more conservative revenue multiples for AI startups and are directly halting high-valuation financing for companies with zero revenue. Multiple venture capital firms have advised their portfolio companies to lower valuation expectations and to quickly build up cash reserves. Market participants warn that the outcome of Anthropic’s IPO will be a barometer for the industry: if successful, the boom will continue; if it fails, some companies may face elimination.
After the Brazilian election, political discount deepens; Morgan Stanley remains bullish on Petrobras (PBR.US), focusing on fuel pricing and dividends
Morgan Stanley still maintains its most optimistic "Overweight" rating, but has lowered its year-end 2027 target price from $31 to $25.

Corning (GLW.US) receives initial "Buy" rating from Jefferies! AI factories driving a fiber optic rush, with a potential global supply gap of up to 30%
For Corning, the recent profit growth mainly comes from the expansion of AI clusters. As the number of optical links crossing cabinets and campuses increases, customers need to deploy more optical fibers within limited conduit and cabinet space, thus driving demand for high-density optical cables and connection systems.

