UK stablecoin caps to stay until systemic risks fade
The Bank of England won’t lift its proposed stablecoin holding limits until it’s confident a flood of bank deposits into digital assets won’t threaten lending to the real economy, Reuters reported.
- The Bank of England will maintain proposed stablecoin holding limits until it deems risks to financial stability have subsided.
- The plan sets strict thresholds for individuals and corporations, with potential exemptions for major firms.
- The BoE and UK Treasury are also developing a resolution regime to handle potential stablecoin failures and protect market continuity.
According to a Reuters report on Oct. 15, the Bank of England will keep its proposed caps on stablecoin holdings in place until it is convinced that large-scale movement of deposits from banks into digital assets poses no threat to financial stability.
Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden said in a speech that unrestricted stablecoin adoption in the UK could drain liquidity from commercial banks and trigger a sudden contraction in credit for households and businesses.
UK’s cautious stablecoin framework for a still-forming market
The Bank of England’s proposal outlines strict thresholds on how much stablecoin individuals and businesses can hold at any given time. Earlier drafts of the plan suggested limits between £10,000 and £20,000 for individuals, and up to £10 million for corporate entities. The largest firms, however, may be exempted to accommodate operational or settlement needs.
Under Britain’s proposed regulatory framework, the Bank of England would oversee only systemic sterling-denominated stablecoins, including those deemed capable of being widely used for payments or posing a potential threat to financial stability. The Financial Conduct Authority would supervise the rest under a lighter regime.
Parallel to the cap discussion, the BoE is engaged in a critical, though less publicized, effort with the UK Treasury to design a resolution regime for stablecoin issuers. This work focuses on the “what if” scenario of a major stablecoin collapse. The goal is to ensure continuity of services for holders, preventing a disorderly failure from rippling through the financial system.
Meanwhile, Breeden’s firm stance arrives just a week after a Bloomberg report indicated the central bank was preparing to introduce exemptions for certain firms, a move seen as a concession to industry pressure. The UK faces increasing competition from the U.S., where the recent passage of the GENIUS Act has provided a clearer, if still evolving, pathway for dollar-backed stablecoins.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.
Crypto prices
More
