Metaplanet’s Bitcoin Strategy Fails to Yield Expected Returns: Study Reveals
Enterprise Value Plummets as Shares Nosedive by 70% Since June Despite Bitcoin Reserves
Key Points
- Metaplanet Inc’s Bitcoin strategy is under scrutiny as its enterprise value drops below its Bitcoin reserves.
- The company’s share price has not kept pace with its ambitious goal of accumulating 30,000 BTC by the end of 2025.
Metaplanet Inc, a company listed in Tokyo, is facing increasing pressure due to its aggressive Bitcoin strategy. The enterprise value of the company has dipped below the value of its Bitcoin reserves, as stated in a recent Bloomberg report.
The company started buying Bitcoin in April 2024 to hedge against Japan’s persistent economic issues such as rising public debt and a weakening yen. It took a leaf from MicroStrategy’s playbook, making Bitcoin a strategic reserve asset.
Initial Success to Subsequent Pressure
Initially, this strategy was successful. The company’s stock reached record highs by mid-June, trading at a significant premium to the value of its crypto holdings. However, the rally soon halted, and the shares have since dropped about 70% from their peak.
As of October 14, the combined market cap and debt of Metaplanet equaled just 99% of its Bitcoin holdings, causing its modified net asset value (mNAV) to fall below one.
According to data from BitcoinTreasuries.Net, Metaplanet currently holds over 30,823 Bitcoin, valued at over $3.4 billion. This places it as the fourth-largest public holder of the top crypto after Strategy Inc., MARA Holdings, and XXI.
Despite achieving its ambitious target of amassing 30,000 BTC by the end of 2025, the company’s share price has not kept up.
In September, shareholders approved a plan to issue preferred shares, raising about $1.4 billion through an international equity sale to continue expanding its Bitcoin reserves. However, analysts note that with less capital available for countercyclical purchases, the firm’s role as a key market buyer has weakened. This has added to the pressure on its stock, which is down 20% in the past week.
Challenges for Digital-Asset Treasury Firms
Many digital-asset treasury firms (DATs) have recently experienced this stock downturn. Companies that once traded at premiums are now slipping into discounts as investor enthusiasm wanes amid the BTC price slump.
Experts caution that large Bitcoin exposures could spark liquidity crises during downturns, describing the model as a “ticking time bomb.”
Meanwhile, some long-term Bitcoin believers see Metaplanet’s discount as a potential buying opportunity. Despite cooling corporate demand, investors continue to pour money into spot Bitcoin ETFs, attracting over $5 billion in inflows so far in October.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

