Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
The Journey of Hyperliquid (Part 2): Sprouting

The Journey of Hyperliquid (Part 2): Sprouting

ChainFeedsChainFeeds2025/10/11 18:32
Show original
By:佐爷

Chainfeeds Guide:

Assets on HyperEVM are still a reissuance channel for HYPE, and it is still a long way from becoming an independent ecosystem.

Source:

Author:

Zuo Ye

Opinion:

Zuo Ye: Hyperliquid has allied with market makers to provide initial liquidity for HyperCore, but all of this is built on expectations for $HYPE—market makers exchange tokens for long-term profit sharing. The expansion method for HyperBFT nodes is through reallocation, meaning the foundation gradually transfers token shares to market maker nodes to bind their long-term commitment through shared interests. As a result, $HYPE becomes the core liability of Hyperliquid, needing to simultaneously satisfy the demands of market makers, HLP, and token holders. However, these three parties have conflicting interests: if the price of $HYPE stagnates for a long time, retail investors will sell, causing losses for market makers; if the price surges, it could trigger whale cash-outs and systemic risks. Therefore, the team chooses to keep $HYPE fluctuating around the $50 range, a price that retains appreciation potential while maintaining low downside pressure during bear markets. Hyperliquid’s strategy is not to sell liquidity directly, but to package it as a security asset in exchange for node trust and commitment. This security-centric sales logic serves as an important transition before the launch of HyperEVM and lays the foundation for the future token economic system. After Hyperliquid successfully replicated CEX liquidity with HyperCore, it began building an open public chain architecture, allowing $HYPE to become more than just an incentive token and gradually gain real consumption scenarios. However, according to App Capital data, capital flows on HyperEVM still mainly come from $HYPE reissuance and derivative assets, and the ecosystem has yet to form an independent endogenous cycle. LST, lending, and yield protocols are mostly centered around $HYPE, while neutral infrastructure like DEXs struggle to gain traction. Take Kinetiq as an example: it acts like an on-chain reissuer, developing LST, lending, and stablecoin businesses by wrapping $HYPE, and also participates in protocol revenue distribution as a HyperBFT node. In contrast, HyperEVM’s main DEX—HyperSwap—has a TVL of only about $44 million, far below the liquidity levels of mainstream public chains. This means HyperEVM is currently still a leverage amplifier for $HYPE rather than an independent ecosystem. For Hyperliquid to replicate Ethereum’s open growth, $HYPE must shift from buyback support to real consumption, forming a positive cycle through protocol usage and trading activity; otherwise, the relationship between the token and liquidity remains a one-way dependency. Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 proposal and CoreWriter System form a value bridge between HyperEVM and HyperCore. HIP-3 allows users to create their own contract markets on HyperCore, including prediction markets, forex, and options, with each project required to stake 500,000 $HYPE as collateral. On the surface, this is a decentralized auction mechanism, but in reality, the CoreWriter system establishes a cyclical leverage relationship between HyperEVM and HyperCore—$HYPE generated in the ecosystem flows back to HyperCore, resulting in de facto deflation. The crowdfunding model initiated by Kinetiq further strengthens this cycle: project teams raise funds to participate in auctions, and after deployment, must pay fees in $HYPE and share 50% of the profits with Hyperliquid; if violations occur, the staked $HYPE will be confiscated. In this way, trading activity on HyperEVM ultimately translates into value support for HyperCore. It can be said that Hyperliquid, through open access and mandatory staking mechanisms, achieves a closed-loop amplification of token value. HIP-3 not only redefines the economic model of $HYPE, but also marks Hyperliquid’s transition from a single matching system to a hybrid of public chain and exchange, laying the structural foundation for it to become the next Binance-like platform.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?

The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 21:18
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?