If the debasement trade would catapult Bitcoin, why is the market down?
Bitcoin traded at $117,729.81 as of press time, struggling to extend gains from its $126,000 all-time high as short-term positioning dynamics and risk-off flows dominated the medium-term debasement thesis.
The debasement trade thesis gained popularity after JPMorgan published a report on the topic on Oct. 1. The thesis is based on the expectation that fiscal expansion and currency devaluation will drive demand for hard assets.
Consequently, assets that hold buying power, such as gold and Bitcoin, would favor under these conditions. Amid this backdrop, gold reached a new all-time high of $4,059.38 on Oct. 10.
But if gold is benefiting from the debasement trade, why is Bitcoin down by 4.2% on the week?
Short-term pressure
The US dollar is up by 1.3% on the week as of press time, approaching what could be its best weekly close since mid-November 2024.
The movement began after Japanese government bonds reached their highest yield in 17 years, which strengthened the US dollar.
Traders began de-risking mid-week when chatter about a stock bubble surfaced in the markets, fueled by stocks trading near their all-time highs.
On Oct. 10, President Donald Trump threatened tariffs against China as a response to its control over rare-earth elements, which power the supply chain of tech hardware.
Reflections on market structure
The macroeconomic developments affected one of Bitcoin’s major supports for price action, namely the demand from exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
Despite pulling over $1.2 billion on Oct. 6, the second-largest daily inflows on record, Bitcoin ETF flows subsided to $875.6 million the following day.
Data from Farside Investors shows that the flows became even thinner on Oct. 8, totaling $440.7 million. On Oct. 9, the Bitcoin ETFs registered nearly $198 million in inflows, the smallest amount during their spree of nine positive days.
On Oct. 10, the Trump threat prompted a risk-off wobble, triggering long liquidations totaling $807 million over 24 hours, with $580 million wiped out in just four hours.
Temporary setback
Despite the current choppy backdrop, Bitcoin still appears poised to perform strongly in the fourth quarter.
The equity pause, volatile haven bid, and end-of-week trade shock reduced investors’ urgency to add at highs.
Additionally, Bitcoin’s consolidation reflects profit-taking after a 7% rally to $126,000 rather than deteriorating fundamentals.
The debasement narrative persists, but positioning cleanup and flow dynamics will likely dictate near-term price action before macro tailwinds reassert control.
The post If the debasement trade would catapult Bitcoin, why is the market down? appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.
No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.
Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.
Crypto prices
More
