Goldman Sachs, BoA, Citigroup to explore stablecoin launch
A group of top global banks, including Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Citigroup, Santander, and more, will explore stablecoins.
- Top global banks, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup, Santander, to explore stablecoins
- Banks have launched a consortium that will look into issuing 1:1 reserve-backed digital money
- The stablecoin-like asset would launch on a public blockchain network
Major international banks, including Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, and Banco Santander, are joining forces to enter the stablecoin market. According to a report by Bloomberg published on Friday, Oct. 10, the banks will launch a consortium to explore the potential of a stablecoin launch.
The asset in question will be a “1:1 reserve-backed form of digital money that provides a stable payment asset available on public blockchains,” the banks said in a statement. They added that the initiative will focus on G7 countries.
The group, which also includes BNP Paribas, Citigroup, MUFG, TD, and UBS, stated that it is already in contact with regulators about the launch. They are also exploring whether the move would increase competition and bring some of the benefits of crypto assets.
Global banks are increasingly looking into stablecoins
Banks are increasingly looking into stablecoins. On September 25, nine major European banks, including ING, UniCredit, Danske Bank, and CaixaBank, made a similar announcement . The banks stated that they are looking into launching a joint stablecoin amid a positive regulatory shift.
The biggest catalyst for the entry of banks into the stablecoin space is the GENIUS Act, a piece of legislation that clarifies regulations in the U.S. What’s more, this legislation prompted regulators in other jurisdictions to act so they are not left behind.
Stablecoins are a rapidly growing business with major potential. In the second quarter of 2025, Circle reported a revenue of $634 million, a 50% year-over-year increase.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like

Wall Street giants collectively raise rate hike forecasts, US Treasury futures continue to fall, gold drops over 1% to break 4000
After the US October CPI exceeded expectations, Goldman Sachs and Nomura added a forecast for an interest rate hike in March next year, while Deutsche Bank included a forecast for a rate hike in January next year. Currently, the market has fully priced in a 25 basis point rate hike in December, with a 13% probability for a 50 basis point hike. On Wednesday, the US Treasury spot market was closed, but Treasury futures continued to fall, with corresponding yields rising by about 2 to 4 basis points, and spot gold came under pressure, dropping by 1.1%.

No Need to Worry About the Cooling Down of AI Data Center Construction? The US Import Boom Is Unlikely to Subside in the Short Term, Real Impact May Come in 2029
It takes an average of 4.8 years from finalizing investment to starting construction of a data center project, and an additional 2.6 years from construction start to becoming operational. Servers usually cannot be installed until after the building structure and racks are completed. For trade partners such as Taiwan (China), South Korea, and Mexico who rely on US data center supply chain demand, the inertia in construction timelines provides at least a one- to two-year buffer for future exports.

Federal Reserve Major Debate: When Should the Tenure of “Number Three” Williams End?
The main point of contention is whether Williams should step down in June 2028, upon completing a full 10-year term, or in June 2027, when he reaches the mandatory retirement age of 65. Analysts point out that the Federal Reserve Board holds ultimate discretion; if he leaves early, Fed Chair Waller would be able to assert greater control over the appointment to this critical position. However, forcing Williams to shorten his term could easily be interpreted as political manipulation. Williams himself is expected to serve until June 2028.

