AI: Elon Musk Loses One of His Trusted Men
After the surprise departure of the head of X, it is another key figure of Elon Musk’s companies who slams the door. This time, it is the turn of Igor Babuschkin, co-founder of xAi and pillar of the Grok project, to announce his resignation.
In brief
- Facing the abuses of Grok, the co-founder of xAi chooses a responsible AI and leaves the ship.
- Igor Babuschkin breaks away from Musk’s vision to launch a safe and beneficial AI for humanity.
- Between controversies and cascading departures, Musk’s empire wavers on its artificial intelligence strategy.
Grok: an AI without limits that disturbs
Grok, swept 4-0 in chess by OpenAI , is the artificial intelligence signed by Elon Musk. It became known for its sarcastic tone, lack of filters, and even its ability to generate erotic videos. An approach radically opposed to the industry’s standards, often marked by ethical guardrails.
But this strategy shocks. Accused of selective censorship and dubious political stances, the AI Grok crystallizes criticism. The latest incident: a temporary suspension after relaying controversial statements about Israel and the United States. Upon its return, the artificial intelligence denounced censorship and then called the incident a stupid mistake. A new episode illustrating the risky line imposed by Musk.
Igor Babuschkin chooses another path
In a post on X, Igor Babuschkin officially announced his departure, stating that he now wants to work for a safe and beneficial artificial intelligence for humanity . A complete turn, almost in opposition to Grok’s original philosophy.
The engineer does not leave empty-handed. He founded Babuschkin Ventures, a venture capital company dedicated to AI safety research. The goal is twofold: to finance innovative projects and support startups capable of contributing to scientific and human progress.
A series of departures in Musk’s empire
This departure is not isolated. Within a month, Linda Yaccarino, former head of X, also stepped down after two years spent defending the indefensible: a platform plagued by controversies and the exodus of advertisers. She herself had to endure the departure of her right-hand man, Joe Benarroch, weakened by Elon Musk’s increasing pressure.
Babuschkin’s resignation therefore fits into a worrying dynamic for Musk. The billionaire, who regularly accuses OpenAI and its rivals of favoritism towards ChatGPT , continues to defend a radical vision of AI. But faced with these controversies and the multiplication of departures, more and more close collaborators seem to prefer to distance themselves.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.
$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
Crypto prices
More
