Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Corporate Treasuries Are Tightening Ethereum (ETH) Supply – But Risks Remain

Corporate Treasuries Are Tightening Ethereum (ETH) Supply – But Risks Remain

CryptopotatoCryptopotato2025/08/15 16:00
By:Author: Chayanika Deka

CoinMetrics warned that the financial performance of corporate ETH treasuries could affect Ethereum’s overall network health.

Ethereum-focused digital asset treasuries are scaling at a fast pace. This corporate adoption is highlighting the altcoin’s “dual role” as a reserve asset and on-chain yield generator.

While this trend is expected to improve liquidity and network engagement, CoinMetrics believes that it also introduces risks related to leverage, funding, and prudent capital allocation.

Corporate ETH Holdings

In the latest edition of ‘State of the Network,’ Coin Metrics said Ethereum corporate treasuries have accumulated 2.2 million ETH, which is about 1.8% of the crypto asset’s total supply, since July. Five major companies lead this trend, financing purchases through equity raises such as public share offerings or PIPE transactions – Bitmine Immersion Technologies, SharpLink Gaming, The Ether Machine, Bit Digital, and BTCS Inc.

Bitmine alone holds 0.95% of ETH’s supply and aims for 5%. This expansion intersects with Ethereum’s proof-of-stake issuance framework, where rewards are distributed to validators and transaction fees are partially burned.

Such a mechanism can shift Ethereum’s net issuance between inflationary and deflationary states. Large-scale corporate buying may amplify these shifts and would potentially tighten supply during deflationary periods or counteract inflationary pressures.

Since the Merge, Ethereum’s net supply has increased by 454.3K ETH, with 2.44 million issued and 1.98 million burned. Since July, corporate ETH treasuries have acquired more than this net increase, while Ether ETFs continue to absorb supply from Ethereum’s 107.2 million free float. With 29% staked and 8.9% in smart contracts, the liquid supply is tightening.

Unlike Bitcoin’s halving-driven reduction, Ethereum’s inflationary model makes this demand surge significant. Hence, CoinMetrics warns that steady accumulation could magnify price sensitivity to demand shifts.

Most ETH corporate treasuries are still accumulating holdings, though some are starting to deploy capital on-chain through staking and DeFi. SharpLink Gaming has staked most of its ETH, BTCS Inc. earns yield via Rocket Pool, and The Ether Machine and ETHZilla are preparing for active on-chain management. Staking currently offers 2.95% nominal and 2.15% real yield, generating income while supporting network security.

Liquid staking tokens like stETH are also used in DeFi, which adds liquidity and allows capital-efficient borrowing. On Aave v3, for instance, ETH and stETH create a pool of around 1.1 million ETH, which could grow as treasuries participate.

With Ethereum mainnet handling 1.7-1.9 million daily transactions at low fees, scaled treasury deployment could increase blockspace demand, boost liquidity, and enhance fee revenue. This, in turn, can create a “positive feedback loop” that strengthens staking participation, DeFi depth, and overall network activity.

Treasury Impact on Ethereum Network Health

Publicly listed ETH treasuries are expanding their on-chain footprint. The results of their financial performance carry potential consequences for Ethereum’s long-term network health, according to CoinMetrics. Significant long-term positions can decrease circulating supply, increase legitimacy, and deepen liquidity, but corporate risks like high leverage, concentration, or operational challenges could ripple through the network.

Market conditions and investor sentiment influence treasury decisions. Strong balance sheets and confidence encourage increased participation. On the other hand, sharp price declines, tighter liquidity, or overleveraging may lead to asset sales and lower on-chain activity.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:47
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:22
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:20
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:19