DCG sues Genesis over promissory note debt amid bankruptcy challenges
Digital Currency Group (DCG) has sued its lending subsidiary Genesis, asking a bankruptcy court to confirm it is owed more than $105 million plus interest on a financial backstop extended during the 2022 crypto downturn.
The case, filed on Aug. 14 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, centers on a $1.1 billion promissory note DCG issued to Genesis after the implosion of hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).
According to the complaint, 3AC, one of Genesis’s largest borrowers, defaulted on a $2.36 billion margin call in mid-2022, creating a significant deficit in Genesis Asia Pacific’s equity, a DCG-owned entity.
DCG said it injected the note “voluntarily” to stabilize the business, but argued that when crypto markets rebounded, Genesis profited from collateral tied to 3AC far beyond the note’s original value. Those gains, it contends, reduced the principal balance and now leave $105 million outstanding.
In a statement, DCG said it “took extraordinary efforts” to keep Genesis afloat in 2022 and simply wants the court to “confirm” repayment status.
The filing adds another dispute to the strained relationship between the two companies. Earlier this year, Genesis’s litigation oversight committee sued DCG, its CEO Barry Silbert, and other executives, alleging that billions of dollars were wrongfully taken from the lender in 2022.
Genesis, one of several high-profile firms to collapse in the wake of the FTX bankruptcy, halted lending in late 2022 and filed for Chapter 11 protection in early 2023.
It emerged from restructuring last year and began distributing roughly $4 billion to creditors, with recovery amounts varying by asset type. As an equity holder, DCG is among the last to be repaid and has challenged parts of the bankruptcy plan.
The post DCG sues Genesis over promissory note debt amid bankruptcy challenges appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
