Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Digital Currency Group (DCG) drags subsidiary Genesis Global Capital to court over $1.1B

Digital Currency Group (DCG) drags subsidiary Genesis Global Capital to court over $1.1B

CryptopolitanCryptopolitan2025/08/16 00:15
By:By Hannah Collymore

Share link:In this post: Digital Currency Group (DCG) has filed a lawsuit against its subsidiary, Genesis Global Capital LLC, concerning a $1.1 billion promissory note. The $1.1 billion promissory note is a safeguard that Genesis had in place. Genesis also sued DCG for $2.1 billion to get more funds to pay back additional customers, accusing it of fraud and mismanagement amounting to $3.1 billion.

Digital Currency Group (DCG) has reportedly filed a lawsuit against its bankrupt subsidiary, Genesis Global Capital LLC, seeking over $105 million plus interest in relation to a $1.1 billion promissory note issued in 2022. 

DCG filed its complaint on Thursday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York. In the lawsuit, it claimed that it had attempted to fix a potential “hole” after the collapse of crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital in 2022, which the firm said was one of Genesis’s largest borrowers, via the $1.1 billion promissory note.

DCG drags subsidiary to court

According to DCG, Three Arrows did not satisfy a margin call by Genesis in 2022, which led to a $2.36 billion default and subsequently left a gap in the book value of GAP’s (Genesis Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.) equity.

However, later, crypto prices recovered and Genesis allegedly recorded “massive gains from the TAC Collateral in excess of the value of the TAC Collateral at the time of the issuance of the Note — which are denominated as ‘TAC Recoveries’ — immediately and automatically reduced the Principal Amount of the Note on a dollar-for-dollar basis.”

“In fact, Genesis has realized gains on the TAC Collateral subsequent to issuance of the Note that far exceed its initial $1.1 billion Principal Amount,” the filing claims .

See also FTX investors drag Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West to court over links to SBF fraud

DCG now wants the court to make Genesis Global Capital pay it over $105 million plus interest.

The lawsuit is the latest move in the ongoing saga between Genesis and DCG. Back in May, the Genesis Litigation Oversight Committee slammed DCG, its CEO Barry Silbert, and other executives with lawsuits in a bid to recover billions in funds that were allegedly taken away falsely from the company in 2022.

Genesis was among the crypto firms that faced severe financial strain following the fall of giants like TerraUSD , FTX, and 3AC, leading to its bankruptcy filing in 2023. It was able to complete a restructuring last year and has distributed approximately $4 billion in assets to creditors, with DCG, as an equity holder, last in line for repayment.

Genesis has also sued its former parent company for $2.1 billion so it can get more funds to pay back additional customers.

Genesis also filed a lawsuit against its former parent company

Genesis Global Capital filed a lawsuit against its parent company, Digital Currency Group (DCG), and CEO Barry Silbert, alleging fraud and mismanagement amounting to $3.1 billion.

According to the lawsuit, DCG mismanaged funds and engaged in fraudulent activities like insider self-dealing, fraud, and mismanagement by Silbert, accusing him of improper transfers exceeding $1 billion while the company was insolvent, all of which led to significant financial losses for Genesis and its stakeholders.

See also Ethereum validator queue climbed to one-week high during the recent ETH rally

The lawsuit was filed in two courts, with Genesis seeking to recover over $3.1 billion related to note and asset transfers incurred during the financial turmoil affecting the cryptocurrency market at the time.

Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:47
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:22
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:20
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:19