FTX customers accuse Fenwick & West of central role in fraud
FTX customers have filed an amended complaint against Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West, alleging it played a key role in the crypto exchange’s fraud before its 2022 collapse.
The filing is part of a multi-district litigation (MDL) and follows a June 2023 complaint claiming the firm aided and abetted Sam Bankman-Fried’s alleged fraud, negligence, fiduciary breach, and misappropriation of customer funds.
Fenwick denied the allegations in September 2023, seeking dismissal of all claims with prejudice on grounds the plaintiffs failed to state a valid claim.
Plaintiffs argue the amended complaint is strengthened by evidence gathered from multiple investigations over the past two and a half years.
This marks the first substantive amendment to the “FTX Law Firm Track” within the MDL, now proceeding solely against Fenwick & West.
The revised complaint seeks court approval to add new facts and render Fenwick’s motion to dismiss moot.
Out of 130 law firms that worked with FTX, only Fenwick is named, after the FTX Independent Examiner found it was involved in “nearly every aspect” of the exchange’s wrongdoing.
Plaintiffs claim Fenwick had actual knowledge of the fraud and provided substantial assistance, violating federal racketeering laws and promoting unregistered securities in breach of Florida and California statutes.
The firm allegedly created and managed corporate structures, including Alameda Research, FTX, and North Dimension, without safeguards to prevent large-scale fund misappropriation.
Evidence from Bankman-Fried’s trial purportedly shows FTX insiders relied on Fenwick’s reputation to gain credibility, attract billions in venture capital, and placate regulators.
The plaintiffs contend Fenwick’s actions either amounted to professional negligence causing billions in losses or made it a “key and crucial” participant in the fraud.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
