Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
A Russian Hacking Group Is Using Fake Versions of MetaMask to Steal $1M in Crypto

A Russian Hacking Group Is Using Fake Versions of MetaMask to Steal $1M in Crypto

CryptoNewsNetCryptoNewsNet2025/08/10 19:30
By:decrypt.co

The Russian hacking group GreedyBear has scaled up its operations in recent months, using 150 “weaponized Firefox extensions” to target international and English-speaking victims, according to research from Koi Security.

Publishing the results of its research in a blog, U.S. and Israel-based Koi reported that the group has “redefined industrial-scale crypto theft,” using 150 weaponized Firefox extensions, close to 500 malicious executables and “dozens” of phishing websites to steal over $1 million within the past five weeks.

Speaking to Decrypt, Koi CTO Idan Dardikman said that the Firefox campaign is “by far” its most lucrative attack vector, having “gained them most of the $1 million reported by itself.”

This particular ploy involves creating fake versions of widely downloaded crypto wallets such as MetaMask, Exodus, Rabby Wallet, and TronLink.

<span></span>

GreedyBear operatives use Extension Hollowing to bypass marketplace security measures, initially uploading non-malicious versions of the extensions, before updating the apps with malicious code.

They also post fake reviews of the extensions, giving the false impression of trust and reliability.

But once downloaded, the malicious extensions steal wallet credentials, which in turn are used to steal crypto

Not only has GreedyBear been able to steal $1 million in just over a month using this method, but they have greatly ramped up the scale of their operations, with a previous campaign–active between April and July of this year–involving only 40 extensions.

The group’s other primary attack method involves almost 500 malicious Windows executables, which it has added to Russian websites that distribute pirated or repacked software.

Such executables include credential stealers, ransomware software and trojans, which Koi Security suggests indicates“a broad malware distribution pipeline, capable of shifting tactics as needed.”

The group has also created dozens of phishing websites, which pretend to offer legitimate crypto-related services, such as  digital wallets, hardware devices or wallet repair services.

GreedyBear uses these websites to coax potential victims into entering personal data and wallet credentials, which it then uses to steal funds.

“It is worth mentioning that the Firefox campaign targeted more global/English-speaking victims, while the malicious executables targeted more Russian-speaking victims,” explains Idan Dardikman, speaking to Decrypt.

Despite the variety of attack methods and of targets, Koi also reports that “almost all” GreedyBear attack domains link back to a single IP address: 185.208.156.66.

According to the report, this address functions as a central hub for coordination and collection, enabling GreedyBear hackers “to streamline operations.”

Dardikman saidthat a single IP address “means tight centralized control” rather than a distributed network.

“This suggests organized cybercrime rather than state sponsorship–government operations typically use distributed infrastructure to avoid single points of failure,” he added. “Likely Russian criminal groups operating for profit, not state direction.”

Dardikman said that GreedyBear is likely to continue its operations and offered several tips for avoiding their expanding reach.

“Only install extensions from verified developers with long histories,” he said, adding that users should always avoid pirated software sites.

He also recommended using only official wallet software, and not browser extensions, although he advised moving away from software wallets if you’re a serious long-term investor.

He said, “Use hardware wallets for significant crypto holdings, but only buy from official manufacturer websites–GreedyBear creates fake hardware wallet sites to steal payment info and credentials.”

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:47
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:22
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:20
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:19