BlackRock Says No To XRP ETF – What Are They Really Waiting For?
BlackRock has confirmed it has “no plans at this time” to launch spot ETFs for XRP or Solana, despite Ripple’s legal victory. The decision has fueled industry debate, with some analysts calling it a prudent focus on Bitcoin and Ethereum, and others warning it could be a costly oversight.
BlackRock has ruled out launching spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for XRP or Solana (SOL) soon.
The stance comes despite growing industry chatter and the recent conclusion of Ripple’s long-running legal battle with the US SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission).
Why BlackRock Is Staying Away From XRP
BlackRock reportedly has “no plans” to offer XRP spot ETFs or its prospective Solana ETF. The clarification came just hours after ETF Store President Nate Geraci suggested the asset management giant could eventually enter the XRP ETF market.
BlackRock immediately calls me out…Says *no* plans at this time to launch spot xrp (or sol) ETF.IMO, this will be looked back on as a mistake.We shall see.via @ForTheWynn_ pic.twitter.com/9nQaA3ZYDO
— Nate Geraci (@NateGeraci) August 8, 2025
Geraci had earlier posted that he thought BlackRock was waiting for the end of the longstanding Ripple vs. SEC case before filing for the iShares XRP ETF.
Geraci also pointed to Ethereum’s growing institutional traction, quoting Matthew Sigel’s view that Bitcoin dominance has started to drop as banks, fintechs, and corporates adopt stablecoins, many of which will be settled on open-source blockchains like Ethereum.
ETFs & treasury cos have bought $19bil eth this yr…$7bil ETFs$12bil cos“Btc dominance has started to fall meaningfully as banks, fintechs, & corporates embrace stablecoins, many of which will be settled on open-source blockchains like eth” –@matthew_sigelvia @sidcoins
— Nate Geraci (@NateGeraci) August 9, 2025
Low Demand Beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum
Meanwhile, BlackRock executives have repeatedly stressed that client interest outside Bitcoin and Ethereum remains minimal. In December, BeInCrypto reported Robert Mitchnick, Head of Digital Assets at BlackRock, saying there is “very little” demand for other crypto ETFs.
“I don’t think we’ll see a long list of crypto ETFs. If you think of Bitcoin, it represents about 55% of the market cap today. Ethereum is at 18%. The next plausible investible asset is at, like, 3%. It’s not close to being at that threshold or track record of maturity, liquidity, etc.,” Mitchnick said.
In the same tone, Jay Jacobs, the head of BlackRock’s ETF department, said BlackRock was not planning to launch any new altcoin-focused ETFs.
Jacobs also emphasized the company’s intention to expand the reach of its existing Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which have performed exceptionally well so far.
“We’re just at the tip of the iceberg with Bitcoin and especially Ethereum. Just a tiny fraction of our clients own IBIT and ETHA, so that’s what we’re focused on (vs. launching new altcoin ETFs),” ETF analysts Eric Balchunas reported, citing Jay Jacobs’s statement at the time.
Samara Cohen, the firm’s Chief Investment Officer of ETF and Index Investments, told Bloomberg that for BlackRock, only Bitcoin and Ether meet that bar, for now, on metrics of investing ability considerations and client considerations.
“… I think it will be a while before we see anything else,” Cohen said in the interview.
Meanwhile, Balchunas agrees that BlackRock may see little incentive to expand beyond its two crypto ETFs.
He believes the firm will unlikely pursue an index-based crypto ETF, potentially including XRP, this year, citing diminishing returns from broadening its offering.
I just think they are happy w the two. Law of diminish returns from here on out. But again I’ve nothing to go on but my own spidey sense here.
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) August 8, 2025
Meanwhile, while BlackRock’s stance may be a cautious, data-driven decision, it may also be a missed opportunity in the making, but only time will tell.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.
$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
Crypto prices
More
