Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Was CrediX an exit scam? Team goes dark after $4.4m exploit

Was CrediX an exit scam? Team goes dark after $4.4m exploit

Crypto.NewsCrypto.News2025/08/07 16:00
By:By David MarsanicEdited by Jayson Derrick

After suffering a $4.4 million exploit, the CrediX Finance team went dark, suggesting a possible exit scam.

Summary
  • CrediX Finance is suspected of being an exit scam after the team deletes website, social media
  • Just days ago, the firm claimed that it had reached a settlement with hackers
  • Users lost $4.4 million in potentially to scammers who run CrediX

After days of false promises following a $4.4 million exploit, the CrediX team has now gone dark. On Friday, August 8, blockchain security firm CertiK noted that the team deleted its X account, while the official website remains offline.

https://twitter.com/CertiKAlert/status/1953752324909707322

This comes just days after CrediX Finance claimed it was working to recover the stolen funds. On August 5, the team announced that it had reached a deal with the hacker, with an expected return of funds within 24 to 48 hours. However, no funds have been returned, and the team has since ceased all public communication.

Why CrediX might be an exit scam

On August 4, crypto.news reported on the CrediX Finance exploit, which resulted in losses of approximately $4.5 million. At the time, several blockchain security firms pointed to a compromise of CrediX’s multisig admin and bridge wallet as the likely attack vector. While it was initially unclear how the hackers obtained such high-level access, new developments suggest a different possibility.

The deletion of social media accounts and the website follows a known pattern often associated with exit scams. In these scenarios, project teams abruptly abandon their platforms and disappear with user funds.

Exit scammers often delay withdrawals or publish false updates in an attempt to buy time and extract more deposits from users. Once user trust is exhausted, the scammers vanish, leaving no way to recover the lost funds.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:47
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:22
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:20
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:19