Two Seas Capital disputes $9 billion sale of Core Scientific to CoreWeave
- Core Scientific's Largest Active Shareholder Rejects CoreWeave Deal
- Bitcoin mining sale considered undervalued
- All-stock transaction worries investors
Two Seas Capital, Core Scientific's largest active shareholder, announced it will vote against the proposed sale of the bitcoin mining company to CoreWeave, valued at $9 billion. In an open letter , the manager classified the assessment as “inadequate” and asked other investors to also reject the operation.
The deal, which closed in July, provides for each Core Scientific shareholder to receive 0,1235 CoreWeave Class A shares for each share held. The all-stock transaction, which includes a 66% premium over the pre-announcement price, would integrate the mining company's 1,2 GW data center network with CoreWeave's AI computing business, which serves clients such as OpenAI and Microsoft.
According to Two Seas, the proposal exposes shareholders to the volatility of CoreWeave's shares without offering any guarantees of value at closing or later. The asset manager noted that the structure "unfairly favors" the buyer and that Core Scientific's share price fell 30% following the announcement, signaling market dissatisfaction.
Despite the opposition, Two Seas stated that it is not opposed to a merger, as it is also an investor in CoreWeave and recognizes potential synergies. However, it maintains that any offer must reflect Core Scientific's strategic value and growth potential, especially in a scenario of high demand for efficient data centers and artificial intelligence infrastructure.
The letter reinforces that the asset manager is open to new proposals, including from CoreWeave itself, provided they present more favorable terms. Currently, Two Seas holds more than 19,1 million shares in Core Scientific, approximately 6,3% of the company.
The sale, which is still subject to shareholder and regulatory approval, is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2025. If approved, Core Scientific shareholders would own less than a 10% stake in the combined company, replacing a previous $10 billion hosting agreement.
Meanwhile, Core Scientific shares are up 46,7% over the past 12 months, and CoreWeave, the fourth-largest public bitcoin miner, has a market value of approximately $4,3 billion.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
