Crypto: SEC Raises Red Flags Over Legal Risks in Liquid Staking
While the crypto industry is still searching for its regulatory compass, the SEC has just spotlighted a rapidly growing practice: liquid staking. In a statement as technical as it is meaningful, the agency specifies that certain forms of liquid staking could escape securities regulation. A welcome nuance, certainly, but one that does not dispel the lingering legal gray areas over the sector. Analysis.
In Brief
- The SEC paves the way for a more flexible interpretation of liquid staking, without completely removing legal uncertainties.
- Each protocol will have to prove that it remains outside the securities framework, under threat of potential sanctions.
- Under Paul Atkins, crypto regulation is evolving towards a strategic dialogue, without abandoning sector control.
Warning about the legal risks of liquid staking
At the heart of attention: this famous practice that allows staking your crypto while retaining liquidity thanks to “receipt tokens.” A typically Web3 innovation, both agile, ambitious, but legally slippery.
Until now, the SEC left doubt hanging: was it a disguised securities sale? An undeclared financial scheme? Despite this gray area, some projects continued to develop, even mobilizing one million dollars to support the builders of Web3, in a regulatory uncertainty climate that remains heavy.
In its recent statement , the agency partially rules. Depending on facts and circumstances, some of these operations would not fall under the 1933 and 1934 laws governing securities offerings.
In other words, not all cases are treated the same way. This is not an absolution but a first step towards a more nuanced and contextual reading of the regulation.
This opens a door but above all a minefield for the concerned crypto protocols and platforms. Each liquid staking model will now have to prove that it is neither a promise of guaranteed return nor a disguised securities sale. The fog recedes, certainly, but the legal risk remains very real.
Crypto regulation: a new era under Paul Atkins
Behind this change of tone is a change of man. The new SEC chairman, Paul Atkins, embodies a less repressive approach to crypto regulation.
Gone is the strong-arm method à la Gensler; replaced by a more open dialogue between technological innovation and legal framework. The agency indicates that certain forms of liquid staking would not necessarily fall under the current securities laws.
Since Paul Atkins’ arrival, signals of openness multiply: clarification on proof of stake, launch of the Crypto project, approval of ETFs Bitcoin and Ether with in-kind redemptions. Everything indicates a willingness to adapt, not to confront.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.
$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
Crypto prices
More
