BlackRock’s BUIDL fund hit by $447M outflow after 18-month record breaking $2.8B inflow
BlackRock’s tokenized U.S. Treasury fund, BUIDL, recorded approximately $447 million in net outflows over the past 30 days, marking its steepest monthly drawdown since launch, according to data from RWA.xyz.
The redemptions, concentrated in the Ethereum-based BUIDL-I share class, coincide with outflows from other major Treasury-backed products, including Superstate’s USTB and Circle’s USYC, which saw $287 million and $67 million in net redemptions, respectively, over the same period.
While BUIDL’s market cap had surged to $2.87 billion across 18 months, peaking as the largest on-chain U.S. Treasury product, the recent downturn has pushed its total value to approximately $2.42 billion as of August 1, reflecting a 15.21% drop in the trailing 30 days.
Per RWA.xyz, the supply reduction was isolated to the BUIDL-I contract (`0x6a9DA2…C89041`), while the primary BUIDL share class (`0x7712…8Aa2AEc`) registered net inflows. This bifurcation indicates the drawdown is not across the entire product but instead linked to share-class-specific redemptions.
Why is BUIDL losing funds?
The most plausible drivers for the retreat stem from large ecosystem participants reallocating capital. Protocols such as Ondo Finance and Ethena, both of which have disclosed major BUIDL positions, appear as primary candidates.
Ethena Labs held $1.29 billion in BUIDL as of March 2025, while Ondo previously transitioned substantial portions of its OUSG liquidity strategy into BUIDL. Ethena’s USDtb, its BUIDL-backed synthetic stablecoin, permits instant atomic redemptions, allowing treasury migration at scale. Simultaneously, Ondo’s OUSG Instant Manager wallet (`0x282698…A6A43`), a known major recipient of monthly BUIDL distributions, likely contributed to the net share-class shift.
Additional outflows may be linked to operational dynamics introduced mid-June when BUIDL became eligible collateral on derivatives exchanges Deribit and Crypto.com. This integration has likely increased the product’s cyclical liquidity patterns around expiries and hedging flows. Redemptions from such platforms tend to exhibit short-term volatility rather than structural exits, suggesting that some of the drawdown may revert in subsequent weeks.
Historical frictions in redemption latency may also play a role. Earlier in the year, Circle’s redemption facility for BUIDL experienced brief capacity constraints, which led some allocators to diversify liquidity sources. The result is a more mobile and opportunistic use of BUIDL, with large holders dynamically shifting allocations based on network conditions, redemption throughput, and competing yield products.
On-chain analysis supports the hypothesis that redemptions were concentrated in the BUIDL-I Ethereum contract, where supply decreased meaningfully between July 1 and August 1. In contrast, the main BUIDL token contract saw a marginal supply uptick. Etherscan traces show that wallets linked to Ondo’s OUSG and possibly Ethena’s reserve stack (used to back USDtb) are the likely endpoints of these reallocation events.
The broader tokenized Treasury sector saw uneven flows over the same period. While BUIDL and USTB led outflows, WisdomTree’s WTGXX recorded $165 million in net inflows, followed by Securitize’s VBILL and OpenEden’s TBILL, which added $22 million and $15 million, respectively. These shifts suggest that while some capital exited the sector or rotated internally, appetite for tokenized short-term yield instruments remains present.
BUIDL remains the sector’s most prominent instrument by total value, but the latest activity reveals how its scale has made it sensitive to the internal portfolio adjustments of just a handful of large holders.
With more venues enabling BUIDL collateralization and redemption mechanics continuing to evolve, future shifts may increasingly reflect tactical reallocations rather than directional sentiment.
The post BlackRock’s BUIDL fund hit by $447M outflow after 18-month record breaking $2.8B inflow appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
