Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Comprehensive Reform of Digital Asset Regulation Proposed in U.S.

Comprehensive Reform of Digital Asset Regulation Proposed in U.S.

CoinspaidmediaCoinspaidmedia2025/07/31 17:35
By:Coinspaidmedia

The administration of President Donald Trump introduced a comprehensive plan to reform the regulation of digital assets in the United States. The plan aims to support innovation, develop the crypto market, and protect consumer rights.

Comprehensive Reform of Digital Asset Regulation Proposed in U.S. image 0

The National Economic Council’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets proposed a package of measures intended to clarify the regulation of the digital asset market in the U.S.

The authors emphasize that the proposed approach is designed to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the world” and to eliminate the consequences of the previous administration’s policies, which were criticized within the industry for excessive pressure on companies working with digital assets.

The package is viewed as a strategic plan to strengthen the U.S.’s position in the global financial market amid growing competition in digital technologies and includes recommendations in the following areas:

  • citizens’ rights and freedom to use technologies;
  • development of the digital asset market;
  • banking sector and digital assets;
  • stablecoins and payment systems;
  • combating illegal use of digital assets;
  • taxation of digital assets.

Key requirements outlined in the document include:

  • legally securing individuals’ right to store their digital assets without intermediaries and conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions for lawful purposes;
  • establishing principles that determine when control over an asset triggers obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA);
  • excluding software developers for non-custodial services from classification as “money transmitters”;
  • immediately allowing digital asset trading at the federal level;
  • regulating spot markets for digital assets;
  • permitting the use of DeFi protocols and setting rules based on the degree of actual decentralization of the project;
  • banning practices similar to “Operation Choke Point 2.0,” i.e., regulatory pressure on banks to de-bank crypto companies;
  • ensuring technological neutrality in banking requirements that should assess risks of specific transactions rather than prohibit or limit activities based on technology used or industry affiliation;
  • allowing banks to freely pilot new activities related to digital assets and blockchain innovations;
  • enacting a law banning the issuance of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in the U.S.;
  • clarifying the application of the BSA to foreign market participants;
  • enhancing information sharing between private and public sectors to combat illegal activity with clear limits on the purpose of such exchange;
  • issuing clear guidelines on digital asset taxation;
  • revising the stance on taxation of income from crypto staking and mining;
  • recognizing cryptocurrencies as a separate asset class for tax purposes.

The document’s authors state that some proposals may be implemented within the current authority of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and banking regulators. However, key initiatives and legislation will require Congressional approval.

“We are creating rules that do not stifle innovation, but protect the rights of Americans and strengthen the position of the dollar in the digital age. The United States must be the crypto capital of the world — and this plan sets us on that path,” said David Sacks, Chair of the Working Group on Digital Asset Markets.

The GENIUS Act regulating the stablecoin market and imposing strict requirements on issuers was recently passed in the U.S.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:47
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:22
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:20
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:19