Japan Explores Tougher Crypto Regulation For Market Growth
Japan’s crypto regulation is evolving, with proposed changes that aim to better protect investors and address market growth. Key reforms include stricter oversight for fundraising tokens and a focus on transparency.
Japan advances tougher crypto regulation, transitioning oversight from the Payment Services Act to investment-focused Financial Instruments Exchange Act.
The move aims to enhance investor protection as crypto markets expand rapidly.
FSA Initiates Strategic Regulatory Recalibration Amid Market Evolution
The Financial Services Agency (FSA) convened the first meeting of its Crypto Assets Working Group on July 31. Discussions centered around reclassifying crypto assets to treat them more comprehensively as investment products rather than merely payment tools.
Japan Crypto Business Association Vice Chairman Shiraishi documented a remarkable global crypto market expansion from $872 billion to $2.66 trillion. However, Japan’s domestic trading ecosystem demonstrates measured growth trajectories, advancing from $66.6 billion in 2022 to forecasted $133 billion levels.
Despite holding 12.1 million accounts worth $33 billion, Japan’s crypto industry perceives diminishing global market influence.
Tougher Regulation and Investor Protection
Proposed regulatory frameworks establish a bifurcated classification system distinguishing fundraising tokens from established digital assets. Fundraising tokens would mandate comprehensive issuer disclosure requirements, while existing assets like Bitcoin maintain exchange-regulated oversight structures.
Tokyo University’s Yuichiro Matsui endorsed comprehensive regulatory reform initiatives, underscoring the critical necessity for updated crypto oversight frameworks. Georgetown University’s Shinichiro Matsuo advocated for multifaceted regulatory approaches emphasizing sustainability, security, adaptability, and strategic international alignment principles.
The complexity surrounding taxation also arose. Tax expert Yuichi Murakami dismissed industry calls for separate crypto wallet taxation, citing widespread fraud, security vulnerabilities, and inadequate calculation infrastructure.
“Claiming wallets need separate taxation for Web3 growth is nonsense unless clear tax reporting and investor protection measures are in place,” Murakami argued on X.
The working group plans detailed regulatory development, addressing transparency, combating fraud, and potentially introducing insider trading laws. Concrete proposals are expected by year-end, with legislative action possible by early 2026.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
