Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Crypto Theft May Not Be a Crime Under Current German Law

Crypto Theft May Not Be a Crime Under Current German Law

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2025/07/29 13:09
By:Mohammad Shahid

A recent ruling by a German court suggests that transferring crypto from someone else's wallet using known credentials may not violate criminal law—raising major concerns for digital asset holders.

A German appeals court has ruled that using known wallet passwords to transfer cryptocurrency without permission may not violate criminal law. 

The decision is drawing sharp criticism from legal and crypto communities who warn it exposes a dangerous gap in existing statutes.

German Legal Loophole Allows Crypto Thief To Walk Free 

A man helped someone (the complainant) set up a crypto wallet to hold €2.5 million worth of certain tokens. 

The thief created the wallet and retained the 24-word recovery phrase. Unfortunately, the victim never changed that recovery phrase. 

Later, without authorization, he used the correct recovery phrase to transfer and potentially steal all the coins. The defendant was not authorized to move the coins and gave false statements.

The Higher Regional Court of Braunschweig concluded that the defendant did not “hack” the wallet, since he used passwords he had legitimately set up and retained. 

Therefore, the action did not satisfy the requirement of “overcoming a special access security” as defined under Germany’s Criminal Code.

Furthermore, the court ruled there was no deception involved, rejecting charges of computer fraud. 

Blockchain systems, the court said, do not assess user intent or permission. It only affirms the presence of a valid cryptographic signature. The court also dismissed claims of data tampering. 

This means that as long as someone has a valid password or recovery phrase—regardless of how they obtained it—transferring assets may not count as a crime, at least under current German law.

The ruling effectively removes criminal liability for actions that would otherwise be seen as theft in traditional finance. It highlights the legal system’s struggle to adapt to the technical structure of decentralized assets.

The court noted that while the conduct may violate civil obligations, contract breaches, or broken trust, do not automatically qualify as criminal offenses. 

However, the ruling does not suggest that all crypto theft is legal. If credentials were obtained through fraud or hacking, different charges could apply. But this case centered specifically on non-technical access using pre-existing, known credentials.

For now, the judgment exposes a gray area that German lawmakers have yet to address. 

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:22
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

智通财经•2026/11/11 08:20
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 08:19

Wall Street tech mogul Dan Ives: SpaceX (SPCX.US) shares have a 20%-25% "political discount"; merger with Tesla (TSLA.US) still possible

Dan Ives believes that SpaceX's stock currently has a "political discount" of 20% to 25%. At the same time, he still expects SpaceX to merge with Tesla, but this deal will face more obstacles.

智通财经•2026/11/11 07:41