Investors are balking at ‘excessive’ Bitcoin miner exec pay: VanEck
US Bitcoin mining executives are earning well above their peers in the IT and energy sectors due to generous stock compensation packages, and shareholders are fighting back, according to new findings from asset manager VanEck.
Despite “aggressive compensation packages,” Bitcoin mining firm shareholders are “balking,” VanEck head of digital assets research Matthew Sigel and investment analyst Nathan Frankovitz reported on Thursday.
The researchers found that average shareholder approval for executive pay packages is just 64% compared to around 90% for S&P 500 and Russell 3000 companies.
“That skepticism appears well-founded. Mining executives continue to grant themselves oversized equity awards that dilute shareholders without reliably linking pay to long-term value creation,” they added.
The researchers reviewed executive compensation across eight US-listed Bitcoin miners: Bit Digital, Cipher Mining, CleanSpark, Core Scientific, Hut 8, MARA Holdings, Riot Platforms and TeraWulf.
The researchers also found that while Bitcoin miner executives earned an average of $6.6 million in 2023, this has nearly doubled to $14.4 million in 2024, which far exceeds comparable sectors such as energy and tech.
Average miner named executive officer (NEO) salaries and bonuses exceed other sectors. Source: VanEck
Equity-based compensation
The compensation is predominantly equity-based, with equity awards comprising 79% of total pay in 2023 and 89% in 2024, the report revealed.
Riot Platforms CEO Fred Thiel received the largest equity award at $79.3 million in 2024. This was nearly double that of MARA Holdings and Core Scientific and multiple times more than the other miner CEOs’ equity grants.
“Miner executive pay practices remain aggressive, equity-heavy, and often weakly aligned with shareholder outcomes.”
Stark disparities in executive pay
The report also highlighted stark disparities in pay-for-performance alignment. While companies like TeraWulf and Core Scientific paid executives just 2% of their market cap growth, Riot Platforms paid 73% of its market cap increase to named executive officers, totaling $230 million in 2024.
The researchers noted that these disparities echo concerns first raised in 2022, when Riot’s shareholders rejected the firm’s say-on-pay proposal after disclosing almost $22 million in CEO compensation.
In 2025, three of the eight miners faced “striking rebukes” on their executive pay proposals, the researchers reported.
Cointelegraph contacted Riot Platforms for comment but did not receive an immediate response.
Riot’s executive compensation far exceeds its peers. Source: VanEck
Performance stock units and vesting
On the positive side, six of the eight miners have adopted performance stock units (PSUs) with multi-year vesting tied to share price targets or relative total shareholder return, and most companies now support annual say-on-pay votes for increased accountability.
PSUs are a type of equity compensation where executives receive company stock, but only if certain performance conditions are met.
VanEck suggested that miners focus on tying bonuses to cost per coin mined, incorporating capital efficiency measures like return on invested capital, and strengthening performance requirements for equity awards with multi-year vesting.
“As Bitcoin miners mature into large-scale infrastructure operators, their executive compensation programs must evolve as well,” they concluded.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
VeChain Eyes a Bullish Reversal as VET Targets $0.018 After Key Support Test
Fear is the biggest short! Morgan Stanley calls for bottom-fishing in semiconductors: land and electricity shortages are not a problem, approved projects can't meet demand
Morgan Stanley believes that the recent sell-off in the semiconductor sector has been excessive, and that market panic rather than fundamentals is the biggest risk. Driven by demand for AI infrastructure, downstream orders continue to accelerate, with semiconductor supply remaining the core bottleneck. LPS constraints actually make growth more stable. The sector may fluctuate within a range in the short term and is currently near the bottom; prospects for the computing power and storage subsectors are favorable.
Indian Rupee extends rally amid continued FIIs buying, lower oil prices
Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization
Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.
Crypto prices
More
