Ether price reaches 3K but traders remain cautious on sustained rally
Ethereum (CRYPTO:ETH)'s price surged 13.5% over two days, hitting $3,000, yet key indicators suggest uncertainty about whether this level will hold.
Despite inflows into spot ETFs and rising total value locked (TVL) on the Ethereum network, futures and options markets reveal hesitation among professional traders.
The monthly futures premium for Ether stands at 5%, a slight improvement from 3.5% the previous week, but still near neutral to bearish territory.
The last significant bullish signal was in late January when Ether traded above $3,300.
Ethereum’s layer-2 solutions have seen growth, with $58.6 billion in decentralised exchange volumes over 30 days, but this has not translated into increased demand for ETH or sustained price momentum.
Network fees on Ethereum have declined by 22% to $34.8 million in the past month, reducing the burn rate of ETH and putting downward pressure on its price.
This contrasts with other blockchains like Solana (CRYPTO:SOL) and Tron (CRYPTO:TRX), which have higher relative network fees despite lower TVL.
TVL on Ethereum increased from $50 billion to $73 billion over three months, but trading volumes on decentralised exchanges have dropped to a nine-month low.
Options market data show balanced interest between bullish and bearish strategies, with the ETH options skew at -3%, a slight improvement from +1% the previous week.
The recent price gains were largely driven by a net inflow of $468 million into US-listed ETFs over four days, alongside institutional purchases by companies such as ShapLink Gaming and Bit Digital.
However, it remains uncertain if institutional demand will continue, as derivatives markets reflect limited conviction in a sustained rally.
At the time of reporting, Ethereum price was $2,939.03.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization
Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.
Crypto prices
More
