Bitcoin (BTC) Hits New All-Time High, Can It Avoid Another Meltdown?
Bitcoin price just surged past $116,000, registering a new all-time high above its May 2025 peak. But unlike last time, this rally has a strong institutional tailwind.
South Korea’s K Wave Media has reportedly acquired 88 BTC as part of a larger $1 billion treasury plan. The question now is — can this BTC price breakout avoid the same fate as May’s meltdown to $98,000? Let’s decode the on-chain and chart data.
Exchange Inflows Drop; Where’s the Selling?
According to CryptoQuant, Bitcoin’s exchange inflows have plummeted to just 3,2000 BTC per day (at the time of writing), the lowest since 2015. Back in December 2024, this number was around 97,000 BTC during the $100,000 Bitcoin price breakout.
That’s a massive decline. Even at this new ATH, holders simply aren’t moving their coins to exchanges; a clear sign of low sell pressure and asset confidence.
Exchange inflows track the number of coins sent to exchanges, typically to sell. A sharp drop here signals confidence: whales and retailers are not looking to exit, at least not yet. And that alone makes a May-like dump less likely, structurally.
Moreover, in an interview with BeInCrypto, Alexander Zahnd, Ziliqa’s interim CEO, said that the momentum appears to be real.
“In the near term, the momentum appears real – institutional demand is rising, ETF inflows are strong, and companies continue to add Bitcoin to their balance sheet,” Zahnd told BeInCrypto.
Wallet Clusters Offer Support to the Bitcoin Price
Next, let’s talk defense. According to IntoTheBlock’s In/Out of Money Around Price (IOMAP) metric, over 645,000 addresses purchased BTC between $108,795 and $110,624. That’s 476.65K BTC held near current levels, and it forms a major demand wall.
In May, the price collapsed because support zones cracked fast. This time, if Bitcoin stays above this address cluster, it means short-term buyers are still in the green. That strengthens conviction.
IOMAP indicates the position of past buyers and whether they are in profit (in the money) or loss (out of the money). When large address clusters overlap with price zones, these areas act as key support or resistance.
RSI Divergence Says “Caution,” But Still No Panic
Here’s the risk. While the BTC price has continued to make higher highs, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has made lower highs — a textbook bearish divergence. This can often precede a correction.
However, RSI remains below the overheated zone (under 72), unlike May when it spiked close to 80. That’s the key difference — the divergence exists, but it hasn’t yet reached panic levels. Therefore, a massive correction looks unlikely, but you might want to expect a retracement.
RSI tracks momentum. A divergence between price and RSI indicates fading conviction. But since it’s not yet overbought, the current uptrend may still have fuel left.
Trend-Based Fibonacci Levels Offer Clear Upside Targets
With BTC entering price discovery again (lack of historical reference lines), trend-based Fibonacci extensions help chart potential resistance.
From the swing low of $74,543 to the May high of $111,980, and considering the retracement to $98,000, we get the following resistance levels:
- 0.382 at $112,439
- 0.5 at $116,857
- 0.618 at $121,274
- 1.0 at $135,576
Bitcoin’s latest wick near $116,500 aligns with the 0.5 Fibonacci extension, suggesting that a Bitcoin price move beyond this resistance level could open up the path toward $121,000 and $135,000. These levels act as guideposts for continuation, but only if momentum sustains.
Bitcoin is now above its May high, supported by lower sell pressure, clear institutional buying, and strong support clusters. The Fibonacci roadmap suggests room for further upside.
But caution is warranted. RSI divergence has emerged. If price loses momentum below $109,632 (one of the key support levels), this breakout might lead to another May-like retracement, invalidating the bullish hypothesis. Let’s see if Bitcoin can flip this ATH into a sustainable rally.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization
Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

