US Senate Narrowly Votes to Appoint a Pro-Crypto OCC Chair
Jonathan Gould's confirmation as the next Chair of the OCC signals potential progress for crypto-friendly banking policies, but it could also centralize authority, limiting local jurisdiction influence.
Jonathan Gould, a former BitFury executive and crypto ally, just passed a Senate vote to become the next Chair of the OCC. In this role, he could make national banking policy more crypto-friendly.
President Trump picked Gould for the job months ago, and his confirmation could open new opportunities. However, his role might further centralize authority over crypto, a move which could backfire.
Gould Likely to Become OCC Chair
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), a bureau within the US Treasury, is an overlooked but important piece of federal financial regulation.
In recent months, for example, it’s enabled BTC ETF options trading and allowed banks to expand crypto custody services. Today, the Senate voted to confirm Jonathan Gould as the OCC’s next Chair:
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) July 10, 2025
NEW: The Senate has confirmed Gould in a vote of 50-45.
Gould has a long career in the industry: before his OCC nomination, he was the Chief Legal Officer at BitFury, a blockchain infrastructure firm.
President Trump handpicked him to head this office several months ago, and his impending confirmation could speed up several outstanding policy issues.
The OCC is primarily responsible for overseeing the US banking sector, which could give Gould a lot of influence over crypto during his five-year term. During his previous time as the OCC’s chief counsel, he was firmly pro-crypto and supported friendly stablecoin regulation.
Now that he’s set to take charge at the OCC, Gould could further promote integration between crypto and banking. One possible action to support this would be declaring stablecoins integral to the financial infrastructure or issuing pro-crypto guidelines.
This is quite an improvement from the systemic debanking campaigns of a few years ago.
Still, there are a few concerns that this strategy might have a significant downside. If Gould moves to make the OCC a pro-crypto tool, it’ll centralize regulatory authority away from state control.
However, if anti-crypto political figures seize the federal apparatus, it would be more difficult for local jurisdictions to continue their supportive policies.
Ultimately, though, it’s difficult to predict long-term political ramifications in this highly unstable moment.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization
Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!
Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years
Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027
Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.
Crypto prices
More
