Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Bitcoin’s Role in Trump’s Crypto Agenda: Potential Benefits for Elites Amid Financial Freedom Claims

Bitcoin’s Role in Trump’s Crypto Agenda: Potential Benefits for Elites Amid Financial Freedom Claims

CoinotagCoinotag2025/07/09 16:00
By:Jocelyn Blake
  • Donald Trump’s crypto agenda, while promoting financial freedom, primarily benefits political insiders and wealthy elites, raising concerns about true decentralization.

  • The Trump administration’s deregulation efforts coincide with family-linked ventures expanding their crypto footprint, highlighting potential conflicts of interest.

  • According to COINOTAG, “The politicization of cryptocurrency risks undermining its foundational promise of financial sovereignty for everyday users.”

Trump’s crypto policies favor elites over everyday users, as deregulation and political ties reshape the industry’s landscape, challenging the promise of financial freedom.

Trump’s Deregulation Push: Empowering Elites Over the Masses

The Trump administration’s aggressive deregulation of the cryptocurrency sector has sparked significant debate within financial circles. While the rhetoric champions financial freedom and innovation, the reality suggests a consolidation of power among a select few. Notably, World Liberty Financial (WLF), a crypto venture linked directly to Trump’s family, launched stablecoins and digital tokens amid loosening regulatory oversight. This timing raises questions about the intersection of policy and personal gain.

Moreover, the disbanding of the Department of Justice’s national cryptocurrency enforcement team signals a retreat from rigorous oversight, potentially increasing risks related to fraud and money laundering. This regulatory vacuum disproportionately benefits well-connected entities, allowing them to expand unchecked while everyday investors face a complex and opaque market.

The Rise of Politico-Coins and Centralized Influence

Another emerging trend is the proliferation of cryptocurrencies tied to political figures, often dubbed “politico-coins.” These digital assets leverage political loyalty and influence, blurring the lines between decentralized finance and centralized power structures. Such developments threaten to undermine the foundational ethos of cryptocurrency as a tool for democratizing finance. COINOTAG highlights that these coins “serve more as instruments of political capital than genuine financial innovation,” raising concerns about market manipulation and investor protection.

As these politically affiliated tokens gain traction, the risk grows that crypto becomes another vehicle for entrenched interests rather than a means of broad-based economic empowerment. This dynamic complicates the narrative of crypto as a liberating force and instead paints a picture of selective advantage.

Addressing the Needs of the Unbanked and Underrepresented

Despite the hype surrounding crypto’s potential to revolutionize finance, the current trajectory under Trump’s policies falls short of delivering meaningful benefits to the unbanked and underrepresented populations. The promise of accessible financial services remains largely unfulfilled as regulatory shifts prioritize established players over grassroots inclusion.

True financial empowerment through cryptocurrency requires practical solutions that address everyday challenges—such as reducing remittance fees or providing stable digital currencies in volatile economies. Instead, the focus on speculative gains and political maneuvering detracts from these critical objectives.

Industry leaders and advocates urge a return to crypto’s original mission: to break down barriers and create equitable financial opportunities. This involves stripping away political branding and fostering transparent, user-centric innovations that serve those most in need.

Conclusion

While Donald Trump’s crypto agenda promotes deregulation and financial freedom in theory, the tangible outcomes reveal a landscape skewed toward political favoritism and elite enrichment. The rise of family-linked ventures and politico-coins underscores the risk of centralized influence overshadowing the decentralized ideals of cryptocurrency. For crypto to fulfill its transformative potential, stakeholders must refocus on inclusive access and genuine empowerment, ensuring the technology benefits the many rather than the few.

In Case You Missed It: GMX V1 Faces Possible Exploit Impacting GLP Pool Amid Ongoing Crypto Security Concerns in 2025
0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Hashrate orders are booming, why is "AI trading" falling out of favor? JPMorgan reveals the time lag between AI investment and productivity realization

Joseph Lupton from the JP Morgan Global Economic Research Team pointed out in a research report on November 10 that recent improvements in labor productivity have been driven more by capital deepening and increased intensity of factor utilization. The broad efficiency gains from AI, resulting from process reconstruction, data integration, and organizational adjustments, will still take time to materialize. This means orders for chips, servers, and electrical equipment may grow first, but continuous investment returns for computing power operators and end users may not arrive at the same pace.

智通财经•2026/11/11 05:47

AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Goldman Sachs believes that the AI investment cycle is currently in the "trough of disillusionment," but this is not the first time. The core contradiction lies in the fact that the business models of new cloud computing providers are highly dependent on end-user returns from AI spending, while currently "there are basically zero companies that can attribute profits to AI." Social Capital founder Palihapitiya has clearly defined an 18-month key window, during which the market will decide which AI business models are sustainable and which are not.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 05:11
AI investment enters the "Trough of Disillusionment", the next 18 months will be a life-or-death test!

Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Zheshang Securities believes that Anthropic's revenue is mainly based on usage-based billing, with remaining performance obligations covering only about 5.1 months of annualized revenue, while compute power costs are already locked in with $895.4 billion in irrevocable commitments, some extending as far as 2045. Revenues can be reduced at any time, but costs are non-exitable, creating a highly asymmetric maturity gap between the two—this is the company's real core constraint.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:46
Anthropic's Core Concern: Revenue Can Be Withdrawn at Any Time, but Computing Power Costs Are Locked in for up to 20 Years

Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027

Goldman Sachs warns that the reserve ratio of bank assets has dropped to around 11%, only slightly above the crisis trough of 2019. In the second half of 2027, a deadlock in debt ceiling negotiations will force the Treasury to rebuild the TGA, triggering a "perfect storm" of a sharp drop in reserves and a surge in T-bill supply; combined with stalled money market fund buying, this will create a huge liquidity black hole. The Federal Reserve could be forced into the awkward position of lowering interest rates and launching large-scale bond purchases to rescue the market.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/11 04:12
Triple Pressure from the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and Congress; Goldman Sachs: Liquidity Crisis May Occur in 2027