Investment Performance and Prospects Analysis of Ethereum L2 Solutions
In the past few years, Layer 2 (L2) solutions on Ethereum have made significant progress, with a total value locked (TVL) exceeding $40 billion, up from just $10 billion a year ago. However, despite L2's huge advancements in technology and usage, as liquidity investments, the performance of L2 tokens has generally been poor. Two years ago, the only listed L2s were Optimism and Polygon whose fully diluted valuations (FDV) accounted for 8% of ETH. Now we have Arbitrum, Starkware, zkSync and other L2 projects whose FDVs account for 9% of ETH. Every new listing of an L2 token essentially dilutes the valuation of previously listed ones.
Currently, the total FDV of major L2 tokens is about $40 billion with annualized costs at $40 million; their valuation multiple is approximately 1000 times which contrasts sharply with large DeFi protocols that usually have valuation multiples between 15-60 times. As more L2 projects are launched to market,the FDV of L2 tokens may continue to face pressure and dilution.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Pyth October Report: ARR Jumps 18.9% as Data Expansion Accelerates

Elon Musk: SpaceX (SPCX.US) Q4 revenue is expected to increase by approximately 70% quarter-on-quarter, with government contract income share falling below 10%
Elon Musk stated on Friday that SpaceX (SPCX.US) will continue to reduce its dependence on U.S. government procurement contracts.

After the sharp decline in tech stocks, the White House suddenly canceled the top tech advisor meeting the following day.
The White House has canceled the previously scheduled President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology meeting, which was set for Friday and includes prominent tech leaders such as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The Department of Energy's meeting page briefly listed November 13 as the new meeting date, but the agency later sent an email retracting this information. Currently, the specific date for rescheduling the meeting remains unclear.
