Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Bitcoin ETF Wars: BlackRock, Fidelity Gain Ground on Vanguard as Grayscale Lags

Bitcoin ETF Wars: BlackRock, Fidelity Gain Ground on Vanguard as Grayscale Lags

CoineditionCoinedition2024/06/04 09:55
By:Anisha Pandey
  • 26% of inflows in BlackRock and 56% in Fidelity came from BTC ETFs.
  • Vanguard remains the leader in total ETF inflows for 2024, at $102.8 billion.
  • IBIT has attracted $16.6 billion in inflows, while FBTC has seen $8.9 billion.

BlackRock’s and Fidelity’s Bitcoin ETFs are driving significant inflows for the firms, accounting for 26% and 56% of their respective year-to-date totals, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data cited by Eric Balchunas.

The BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), which launched in January, have attracted $16.6 billion and $8.9 billion in inflows, respectively, according to Farside Investor data .

Balchunas noted that the Bitcoin ETFs are “definitely having an impact on the leaderboard” due to these significant inflows.

However, Vanguard, which does not offer any Bitcoin ETFs, still leads in total ETF inflows for 2024 with $102.8 billion, far surpassing BlackRock’s $65.1 billion.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, manages 429 ETFs with a combined $2.8 trillion in Assets Under Management (AUM). Fidelity manages 70 ETFs totaling $74 billion in AUM.

Another ETF issuer, Invesco, recorded $34.7 billion in ETF flows this year, with its Bitcoin ETF contributing only 0.9% to this total, or $317.3 million, in the first five months.

Notably, IBIT recently surpassed the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) as the world’s largest spot Bitcoin ETF. As of May 28, IBIT holds 291,567 BTC, valued at over $20 billion.

Meanwhile, Grayscale, which initially held 620,000 Bitcoin in January, has experienced significant outflows, reducing its holdings to 285,139 BTC, worth approximately $19.6 billion.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Just bet on AI and already faced a market blow! Berkshire reports earnings tonight, Abel faces a major test in his transformation

Greg Abel has been leading Berkshire Hathaway for less than a year, yet he has already made a bet of over $10.9 billion on the AI sector, marking a complete break from Buffett’s traditional avoidance of tech stocks. However, Alphabet’s stock price has fallen below their initial purchase cost, and Bending Spoons continues to decline, putting this bold AI gamble to the test. At the same time, third-quarter earnings per share are expected to drop 6% year-over-year, and the share repurchase program is likely to plummet from $4.5 billion to $1.6 billion. How to deploy $358 billion in cash will be a major challenge for the new leader’s capital allocation skills.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 09:11
Just bet on AI and already faced a market blow! Berkshire reports earnings tonight, Abel faces a major test in his transformation

Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now

The Goldman Sachs trading desk stated that the current wave of sell-offs resembles the 1998 liquidity crisis more than the bursting of the 2000 bubble. It is a forced deleveraging rather than a refutation of business fundamentals. The market is drastically repricing construction financing and timeline expectations, rather than underlying demand. Moreover, the issues currently drawing the most attention from the market—electricity and licensing—are actually the least important, as limited supply does not equate to disappearing demand. The real question that needs to be answered is whether long-term revenues can ultimately justify the capital invested.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 08:26
Has the AI bubble burst? Goldman Sachs: It's more like 1998 than 2000 right now

Tesla Cybertruck: From Cracked Windows to Production Halt, a Three-and-a-Half Year Journey Ends

Since its launch in 2019, Cybertruck has been mired in controversy—ranging from a failed window demonstration on release day, a four-year delay in mass production, and its price rising from $39,900 to more than $100,000, along with a total of 11 recalls. The day before the halt of production was announced, Tesla raised the price once again, bringing a dramatic and intriguing end to the saga of this vehicle.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/07 04:21
Tesla Cybertruck: From Cracked Windows to Production Halt, a Three-and-a-Half Year Journey Ends